首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Early identification and delay to treatment in myocardial infarction and stroke: differences and similarities
【24h】

Early identification and delay to treatment in myocardial infarction and stroke: differences and similarities

机译:心肌梗塞和中风的早期发现和延迟治疗:异同

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The two major complications of atherosclerosis are acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke. Both are life-threatening conditions characterised by the abrupt cessation of blood flow to respective organs, resulting in an infarction. Depending on the extent of the infarction, loss of organ function varies considerably. In both conditions, it is possible to limit the extent of infarction with early intervention. In both conditions, minutes count. This article aims to describe differences and similarities with regard to the way patients, bystanders and health care providers act in the acute phase of the two diseases with the emphasis on the pre-hospital phase. Method A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Embase (Ovid SP) and Cochrane Library databases. Results In both conditions, symptoms vary considerably. Patients appear to suspect AMI more frequently than stroke and, in the former, there is a gender gap (men suspect AMI more frequently than women). With regard to detection of AMI and stroke at dispatch centre and in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) there is room for improvement in both conditions. The use of EMS appears to be higher in stroke but the overall delay to hospital admission is shorter in AMI. In both conditions, the fast track concept has been shown to influence the delay to treatment considerably. In terms of diagnostic evaluation by the EMS, more supported instruments are available in AMI than in stroke. Knowledge of the importance of early treatment has been reported to influence delays in both AMI and stroke. Conclusion Both in AMI and stroke minutes count and therefore the fast track concept has been introduced. Time to treatment still appears to be longer in stroke than in AMI. In the future improvement in the early detection as well as further shortening to start of treatment will be in focus in both conditions. A collaboration between cardiologists and neurologists and also between pre-hospital and in-hospital care might be fruitful.
机译:背景技术动脉粥样硬化的两个主要并发症是急性心肌梗塞(AMI)和急性缺血性中风。两者都是威胁生命的状况,其特征是突然停止流向各个器官的血液,导致梗塞。取决于梗塞的程度,器官功能的丧失变化很大。在这两种情况下,都可以通过早期干预来限制梗塞的程度。在两种情况下,分钟都是重要的。本文旨在描述在两种疾病的急性期患者,旁观者和医疗保健提供者的行为方式上的差异和相似之处,重点放在院前期。方法在PubMed,Embase(Ovid SP)和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行文献检索。结果在两种情况下,症状差异很大。患者似乎比中风更容易怀疑AMI,在前者中,存在性别差异(男性比女性更容易怀疑AMI)。关于在调度中心和紧急医疗服务(EMS)中检测AMI和中风,两种情况都有改进的余地。 EMS的使用似乎使卒中的发生率更高,但AMI的总体住院时间更短。在这两种情况下,均已显示出快速通道概念会显着影响治疗延迟。根据EMS的诊断评估,与中风相比,AMI中支持的仪器更多。据报道,对早期治疗的重要性的认识会影响AMI和中风的延迟。结论AMI和中风分钟都很重要,因此引入了快速跟踪概念。中风的治疗时间似乎仍然比AMI长。将来,在这两种情况下,早期检测的改善以及开始治疗的进一步缩短将是重点。心脏病专家和神经科医生之间的合作以及院前和院内护理之间的合作可能会硕果累累。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号