首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Healthy Pediatric Athletes Have Significant Baseline Limb Asymmetries on Common Return to Sports Performance Tests
【24h】

Healthy Pediatric Athletes Have Significant Baseline Limb Asymmetries on Common Return to Sports Performance Tests

机译:健康的小儿运动员在共同参加运动成绩测试时具有明显的基线肢体不对称

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in children is associated with a higher risk (?30%) of subsequent ACL injury than in adults. Most RTS testing protocols use Limb Symmetry Indices (LSI) on physical performance tests (PPTs) to assess an athlete’s readiness for sport. This assumes that in a healthy state, both lower extremities are and should be equal. We hypothesized that in the pediatric population, baseline limb asymmetry exists, limiting the clinical utility of LSIs. Since LSI & 90% is often used as a clinical cutoff for RTS, we defined a test as valid if 80% of healthy volunteers had an LSI & 90% on that test. Methods: This study included healthy, uninjured volunteers (n = 63) between the ages of 6 and 18 [mean age = 10.7 +/- 3.2 years; 34 females (54%)]. Pubertal Maturity Observation Scores (PMOS) were calculated for all individuals. Demographic data including sex, chronologic age, Pubertal Maturity Observational Score (PMOS), height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were collected. Subjects performed ten common PPT’s including the lower quarter Y-balance, stork balance, stork balance on BOSU, single leg squat (SLS), SLS on BOSU, clockwise and counterclockwise quadrant single leg hop (SLH), forward SLH, timed SLH, and triple crossover SLH. Subjects performed the 10 PPT’s in the same order (listed above), however we randomly assigned the starting test and the starting limb to avoid practice effects. We conducted two trials on each leg for each test with the exception of the forward SLH, timed SLH, and triple crossover SLH, which were performed in triplicate. For analysis, we developed a composite score for each limb by averaging trials. We then calculated the absolute value of the side-to-side difference, and normalized this difference to the test mean to obtain a percentage side-to-side difference for each test (%STS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of age on limb symmetry while correcting for body mass index (BMI), PMOS and sex. Results: All 63 subjects successfully completed testing. %STS were not normally distributed for any of the PPTs, therefore data were reported as medians and interquartile ranges. All PPTs showed baseline limb asymmetry, and none met our definition of validity (Figure 1). The most symmetric PPT was the clockwise quadrant hop test (%STS in females, median = 9.85, interquartile range = 4.63-18.7; %STS in males, median = 6.9, interquartile range = 3.64-14.04). The stork balance on BOSU test had the greatest limb asymmetry (%STS in females, median 41.4, interquartile range 10.1 - 71.3; %STS in males, median 47.6, interquartile range 18.2-66.7, Figure 2). PMOS was strongly correlated with chronologic age (Pearson’s ? = 0.83), therefore PMOS was excluded as a predictor variable in regression models to avoid multicollinearity. Age was an independent predictor of %STS only for the stork test (β = -1.15, 95% CI = -1.92 to -0.38, p = 0.004), with older subject having less limb asymmetry. Conclusion: Healthy children ages 6 - 18 years have significant baseline limb asymmetries on PPTs that are commonly used for RTS decision making after ACL reconstruction. None of the PPTs evaluated in this study met our definition of clinical validity. Limb symmetry was typically not affected by subject age. In light of these results, limb symmetry indices (LSI) should be utilized with caution in this population. Functional recovery may be better assessed by comparison to age and sex-specific norms. Figure 1. Common Physical Performance Tests Do Not Meet Limb Symmetry Criteria in Healthy Pediatric Volunteers. Figure 2. BOSU Stork Test Limb Symmetry
机译:目的:儿童前十字韧带(ACL)重建后恢复运动(RTS)与成人相比,其后续ACL受伤的风险更高(?30%)。大多数RTS测试协议在肢体性能测试(PPT)上使用肢体对称指数(LSI)来评估运动员的运动准备情况。假设在健康状态下,下肢是并且应该相等。我们假设在儿科人群中存在基线肢体不对称,限制了LSI的临床应用。由于LSI& 90%通常用作RTS的临床临界值,如果80%的健康志愿者的LSI>该测试的90%。方法:本研究纳入了6岁至18岁的健康,未受伤的志愿者(n = 63)[平均年龄= 10.7 +/- 3.2岁; 34位女性(54%)]。计算所有个体的青春期成熟度观察评分(PMOS)。收集人口统计数据,包括性别,年龄,青春期观察分数(PMOS),身高,体重和体重指数(BMI)。受试者进行了十项常见的PPT,包括下四分之一的Y平衡,鹳平衡,BOSU上的鹳平衡,单腿下蹲(SLS),BOSU上的SLS,顺时针和逆时针象限单腿跳(SLH),正向SLH,定时SLH和三重分频器SLH。受试者以相同的顺序执行了10个PPT(上面列出),但是为了避免练习效果,我们随机分配了起始测试和起始肢体。除了每段重复进行的前向SLH,定时SLH和三重交叉SLH外,我们对每条腿进行了两次试验。为了进行分析,我们通过平均试验得出了每个肢体的综合评分。然后,我们计算了左右差异的绝对值,并将此差异归一化为测试平均值,以获得每个测试的左右差异百分比(%STS)。进行多元线性回归分析,以评估年龄对肢体对称性的影响,同时校正体重指数(BMI),PMOS和性别。结果:所有63位受试者成功完成了测试。对于任何一个PPT,%STS都没有正态分布,因此,数据报告为中位数和四分位间距。所有PPT均显示基线肢体不对称,没有一个符合我们对有效性的定义(图1)。最对称的PPT是顺时针象限跳跃测试(女性的%STS,中位数= 9.85,四分位数范围= 4.63-18.7;男性的%STS,中位数= 6.9,四分位数范围= 3.64-14.04)。 BOSU测试中的鹳平衡具有最大的肢体不对称性(女性中,%STS,中位数为41.4,四分位数范围为10.1-71.3;男性中,%STS,中位数为47.6,四分位数,范围为18.2-66.7,图2)。 PMOS与年代年龄密切相关(Pearson's = 0.83),因此在回归模型中将PMOS排除在预测变量之外,以避免多重共线性。仅在鹳测试中,年龄是%STS的独立预测因子(β= -1.15,95%CI = -1.92至-0.38,p = 0.004),年龄较大的受试者肢体不对称性较小。结论:6-18岁的健康儿童在APT重建后通常用于RTS决策的PPT上具有明显的基线肢体不对称。在这项研究中评估的PPT均未达到我们对临床有效性的定义。肢体对称性通常不受受试者年龄的影响。根据这些结果,在该人群中应谨慎使用肢体对称指数(LSI)。与年龄和性别特定规范相比,可以更好地评估功能恢复。图1.健康小儿志愿者中常见的体能测试不符合肢体对称性标准。图2. BOSU Stork测试肢的对称性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号