首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >Situating Cornerstone Propositions
【24h】

Situating Cornerstone Propositions

机译:定位基石命题

获取原文
       

摘要

Ostensibly, Wittgenstein’s last remarks published in 1969 under the title On Certainty are about epistemology, more precisely about the problem of scepticism. This is the standard interpretation of On Certainty. But I contend, in this paper, that we will get closer to Wittgenstein’s intentions and perhaps find new and illuminating ways to interpret his late contribution if we keep in mind that his primary goal was not to provide an answer to scepticism. In fact, I think that the standard reading (independently of its fruitfulness with dealing with scepticism) leads to a distorted view of Wittgenstein’s contribution in On Certainty. In order to see that, scepticism will first be briefly characterised, and then I will attempt to circumscribe more precisely the standard reading of On Certainty. In section 4, three exegetical arguments against the standard reading are offered – the hope being that the weight of these three arguments, taken together, instils doubt in the reader’s mind about the correctness of the standard reading. The paper concludes with an attempt to gesture at the philosophical significance of On Certainty once we set aside the standard reading.
机译:表面上,维特根斯坦在1969年发表的题为“确定性”的最后一句话是关于认识论的,更确切地说是关于怀疑主义的问题。这是“确定性”的标准解释。但是我认为,在本文中,如果我们牢记维特根斯坦的主要目的不是为怀疑主义提供答案,我们将更加接近维特根斯坦的意图,并且也许会找到新的启发性方法来解释他的后期贡献。实际上,我认为标准阅读(独立于其对怀疑主义的卓有成效)导致人们对维特根斯坦在《确定性》中的贡献产生了扭曲的看法。为了看到这一点,首先将简要地描述怀疑论,然后我将尝试更精确地界定“确定性”的标准解读。在第4节中,提供了三种针对标准阅读的训arguments性论点–希望这三个论点的权重加在一起,使读者对标准阅读的正确性产生怀疑。本文的结尾尝试在我们放弃标准阅读后就“确定性”的哲学意义做出姿态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号