...
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Psychiatry >Cued aversive classical conditioning in humans: The role of trait-anxiety
【24h】

Cued aversive classical conditioning in humans: The role of trait-anxiety

机译:提示厌恶人类的经典条件:特质焦虑的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

No study so far has specifically addressed the influence of individual differences in trait-anxiety on aversive classical conditioning as indexed by the startle reflex response. We compared the startle reflex responses between participants classified as high (n = 25) and low (n = 26) in trait-anxiety while undergoing a single-cue aversive classical conditioning procedure. High trait-anxiety group showed a greater startle response to the CS relative to the ITI at the post-acquisition compared with the pre-acquisition phase. Low trait-anxiety group did not show such a clear pattern of conditioning, and results from this group seem to be concealed by differences in the startle responses to the CS and the ITI during the pre-acquisition phase. However, a post-hoc analysis in which such differences at pre-conditioning were removed showed no conditioning effects in low trait-anxiety participants. Taking together, these results suggest differences between high and low trait-anxiety groups in the acquisition of the CS-US association. However, further research should clarify the unexpected pattern of responses shown by low trait-anxiety group.
机译:到目前为止,还没有研究专门研究过性格焦虑的个体差异对反感经典条件的影响,该条件以惊吓反射反应为指标。我们比较了在经历单提示厌恶性经典调节程序时被分类为特质焦虑的高(n = 25)和低(n = 26)的参与者之间的惊吓反射反应。与购前阶段相比,特质焦虑组在购后相对于ITI表现出更大的对CS的惊吓反应。低特质焦虑症组没有表现出如此清晰的调节模式,并且该组的结果似乎被预购阶段对CS和ITI的惊吓反应差异所掩盖。但是,事后分析(其中去除了预适应时的此类差异)显示,在低特质焦虑参与者中没有条件调节作用。综上所述,这些结果表明,在获得CS-US协会方面,高和低特质焦虑人群之间存在差异。然而,进一步的研究应澄清低特质焦虑组所表现出的意外反应模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号