首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Urology >Clinical performance of removable partial dentures: A retrospective clinical study
【24h】

Clinical performance of removable partial dentures: A retrospective clinical study

机译:可摘局部义齿的临床表现:回顾性临床研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Removable partial dentures (RPDs) (conventional and implant-supported) treatment is considered a viable option to replace missing teeth as inexpensively as possible, but it has limitations. Objectives: This study reports the effect of gender and location (maxilla vs. mandible) on the clinical performance of removable partial dentures (RPDs). Materials and Methods: A total of 100 Patients who had RPDs delivered between 1990-1995 were evaluated. A 4-point scoring system was used to assess seventeen criteria. These criteria include acceptance, stability, support, retention, adaptation, occlusion, integrity, and design of the pros-theses, rest and rest seat preparation, occlusal wear, esthetics, phonetics, tissue condition, mobility of abutments, gingival and plaque indices. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U non-parametric statistical tests. Results: The results showed that acceptance of RPDs was rated the lowest. Other reasons for failure were poor retention, lack of integrity of the prostheses and inadequate adaptation. Retention and design of major connectors attributed to Mandibular RPD failure. Success rate of 75% was observed in male compared with 67.2% for female. Maxillary RPDs showed a higher success rate (78%) compared with the mandibular (70.1%). No significant statistical difference in Alpha scores between female and male patients and between maxillary and mandibular RPDs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of RPDs showed a higher success rate in male patients compared to female patients and the maxillary RPDs showed a higher success rate compared to mandibular.
机译:可移动局部义齿(RPD)(传统的和种植体支持的)治疗被认为是一种可行的选择,可以尽可能便宜地替代缺失的牙齿,但是它具有局限性。目的:这项研究报告了性别和位置(上颌骨与下颌骨)对可摘局部义齿(RPD)临床表现的影响。材料和方法:评估了1990-1995年间共100例RPD分娩的患者。 4点评分系统用于评估17个标准。这些标准包括假体的接受性,稳定性,支撑性,保持性,适应性,咬合性,完整性和设计,休息和休息座椅的准备,咬合磨损,美学,语音,组织状况,基台活动性,牙龈和牙菌斑指数。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U非参数统计检验分析数据。结果:结果表明,RPD的接受度最低。失败的其他原因是保持力差,假体缺乏完整性和适应性不足。归因于下颌RPD失败的主要连接器的保留和设计。男性成功率为75%,女性为67.2%。上颌RPD的成功率(78%)高于下颌(70.1%)。女性和男性患者以及上颌和下颌RPD之间的Alpha评分无显着统计学差异(p <0.05)。结论:与女性相比,男性患者的RPDs临床表现显示出较高的成功率,而与下颌骨相比,上颌RPDs显示出更高的成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号