首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Urology >A Comparable Study of Combinational Regenerative Therapies Comprising Enamel Matrix Derivative plus Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral with or without Collagen Membrane in Periodontitis Patients with Intrabony Defects
【24h】

A Comparable Study of Combinational Regenerative Therapies Comprising Enamel Matrix Derivative plus Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral with or without Collagen Membrane in Periodontitis Patients with Intrabony Defects

机译:牙釉质骨内缺损患者牙釉质基质衍生物与脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(含或不含胶原膜)联合再生疗法的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of collagen membrane (CM) in regenerative therapy with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) for periodontal intrabony defects. Methods: Eighteen periodontal intrabony defects of nine chronic periodontitis patients were evaluated. Two defects per patient with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 6 mm were assigned to two different types of treatments: EMD + DBBM + CM or EMD + DBBM. Clinical parameters including Gingival Index (GI), PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), bleeding on probing (BOP), tooth mobility (MOB), and the filled bone volume/rate (FBV/FBR), which was measured by cone beam computed tomography, were compared at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Differences between groups were determined by the chisquare test, McNemar’s test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Clinically, PPD, CAL, and FBR significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05). The between-group comparison showed that the EMD + DBBM + CM group resulted in slightly greater PPD reduction, CAL gain, and FBR; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Periodontal regenerative therapies comprising EMD and DBBM with and without CM resulted in positive clinical outcomes. The use of CM may result in better outcomes in MOB decrease; however, long-term prognosis must be further studied.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是检查胶原蛋白膜(CM)在脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)和牙釉质基质衍生物(EMD)再生治疗牙周骨缺损中的有效性。方法:评估9例慢性牙周炎患者的18例牙周骨内缺损。每位探查口袋深度(PPD)≥6 mm的患者有两个缺陷被指定为两种不同类型的治疗方法:EMD + DBBM + CM或EMD + DBBM。临床参数包括牙龈指数(GI),PPD,临床附着水平(CAL),牙龈退缩(GR),探查出血(BOP),牙齿活动度(MOB)和填充骨量/速率(FBV / FBR),在基线和治疗后12个月比较了通过锥形束计算机断层扫描测量的结果。两组之间的差异由卡方检验,麦克尼马尔检验和威尔科克森符号秩检验确定。结果:在临床上,两组的PPD,CAL和FBR均显着改善(p <0.05)。组间比较显示,EMD + DBBM + CM组导致PPD降低,CAL增益和FBR稍高;但是,这些差异在统计上并不显着。结论:包括EMD和DBBM的牙周再生疗法在有或无CM的情况下均能产生积极的临床效果。使用CM可能会导致MOB降低的预后更好;但是,长期预后必须进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号