首页> 外文期刊>Oncology and Therapy >Routine Surveillance of Chemotherapy Toxicities in Cancer Patients Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
【24h】

Routine Surveillance of Chemotherapy Toxicities in Cancer Patients Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

机译:使用患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的结果版本对癌症患者的化疗毒性进行常规监测

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Systematic documentation of chemotoxicities in outpatient clinics is challenging. Incorporating patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical workflows can be an efficient strategy to strengthen the assessment of symptomatic treatment toxicities in oncology clinical practice. We compared the adequateness, feasibility, and acceptability of toxicity documentation using systematic, prospective, application of the PRO Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) tool. Methods At a comprehensive cancer center, data abstraction of electronic health record reviews elucidated current methods and degree of chemotoxicity documentation. Web-based 32-item PRO-CTCAE questionnaires, administered in ambulatory clinics of patients receiving chemotherapy, captured chemotoxicities and respective severities. Patient telephone surveys assessed whether healthcare providers had addressed chemotoxicities to the patients’ satisfaction. Results Over a broad demographic of 497 patients receiving chemotherapy, 90% (95%?CI 84–96%) with significant chemotoxicities ( n =?107) reported that their providers had discussed toxicities with them; of these, 70% received a therapy management change, while among the rest, 17% desired a change in management. Of patients surveyed, 91% (95%?CI 82–99%) were satisfied with their current chemotoxicity management. Clinician chart documentation varied greatly; descriptors rather than numerical grading scales were typically used. Although 93% of patients were willing to complete the PRO survey, only 50% thought that it would be acceptable to complete this survey at routine clinic visits. Conclusion Use of PRO-CTCAE in routine clinical practice promotes systematic evaluation of symptomatic toxicities and improves the clarity, consistency, and efficiency of clinician documentation; however, methods to improve patient willingness to complete this tool routinely are needed.
机译:简介门诊诊所化学毒性的系统记录非常具有挑战性。在临床工作流程中纳入患者报告的结局(PRO)措施可能是在肿瘤临床实践中加强对症治疗毒性评估的有效策略。我们使用PRO不良事件常见毒性标准(PRO-CTCAE)工具的系统性,前瞻性应用,比较了毒性文献的充分性,可行性和可接受性。方法在综合癌症中心,电子病历记录的数据抽象阐明了当前的方法和化学毒性文献的程度。基于网络的32项PRO-CTCAE问卷在接受化疗的患者的门诊诊所进行管理,捕获了化学毒性和各自的严重程度。病人电话调查评估了医疗保健提供者是否已针对患者的化学毒性进行了治疗。结果在497例接受化疗的患者中,有90%(95%?CI 84-96%)具有显着的化学毒性(n =?107),报告其提供者曾与他们讨论过毒性。其中,有70%的人接受了治疗管理的更改,而在其余的人中,有17%的人希望更改管理。在接受调查的患者中,有91%(95%?CI 82–99%)对其目前的化学毒性治疗感到满意。临床医生图表文件差异很大;通常使用描述符而不是数字等级量表。尽管93%的患者愿意完成PRO调查,但只有50%的患者认为在常规诊所就诊时完成此调查是可以接受的。结论在常规临床实践中使用PRO-CTCAE可促进对症毒性的系统评价,并提高临床医生文献的清晰度,一致性和效率。但是,需要提高患者常规完成此工具的意愿的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号