首页> 外文期刊>Royal Society Open Science >Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
【24h】

Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

机译:克制的饮食者会显示出BMI升高,食物渴望和饮食禁忌吗?荷兰饮食行为问卷的约束量表和约束饮食量表的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite being used interchangeably, different measures of restrained eating have been associated with different dietary behaviours. These differences have impeded replicability across the restraint literature and have made it difficult for researchers to interpret results and use the most appropriate measure for their research. Across a total sample of 1731 participants, this study compared the Restraint Scale (RS), and its subscales, to the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) across several traits related to overeating. The aim was to explore potential differences between these two questionnaires so that we could help to identify the most suitable measure as a prescreening tool for eating-related interventions. Results revealed that although the two measures are highly correlated with one another ( r s = 0.73–0.79), the RS was more strongly associated with external ( r s = ?0.07 to 0.11 versus ?0.18 to ?0.01) and disinhibited eating ( r s = 0.46 versus 0.31), food craving ( r s = 0.12–0.27 versus 0.02–0.13 and 0.22 versus ?0.06) and body mass index ( r s = 0.25–0.34 versus ?0.13 to 0.15). The results suggest that, compared to the DEBQ, the RS is a more appropriate measure for identifying individuals who struggle the most to control their food intake.
机译:尽管可以互换使用,但不同的节制饮食措施与不同的饮食习惯有关。这些差异阻碍了整个约束性文献的可复制性,并使研究人员难以解释结果并为他们的研究使用最合适的方法。在总共1731名参与者的样本中,本研究比较了与暴饮暴食相关的多个特征的克制量表(RS)及其子量表与荷兰人饮食行为问卷(DEBQ)。目的是探索这两个调查表之间的潜在差异,以便我们可以帮助确定最合适的措施,作为与饮食相关的干预措施的预筛选工具。结果显示,尽管这两种措施之间具有高度相关性(rs = 0.73–0.79),但RS与外界因素(rs =?0.07至0.11对?0.18至?0.01)和禁忌饮食(rs = 0.46)有更强的相关性。与0.31),食物渴望(rs = 0.12–0.27与0.02–0.13和0.22与±0.06)和体重指数(rs = 0.25–0.34与±0.13至0.15)。结果表明,与DEBQ相比,RS是一种更合适的方法,用于识别最难以控制食物摄入量的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号