首页> 外文期刊>KYAMC Journal >Management of Fractures Shaft of Tibia in Adult Interlocking Nailing Versus Plating in: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Management of Fractures Shaft of Tibia in Adult Interlocking Nailing Versus Plating in: A Comparative Study

机译:成人联锁钉与板中胫骨骨折轴的处理:比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are the commonest long bone fractures in adults, most commonly managed by intramedullary interlocking nailing. However, several meta-analysis show that locking plate osteosynthesis is equally effective in managing tibial diaphyseal fractures and are associated with less number of complications. Aim: To compare the results of fixation of tibial fractures followingplating and nailing in terms of union, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital based non randomized clinical trial was performed from September 2014 to August 2017 where closed or open diaphyseal or metaphyseo- diaphyseal fractures of the tibia (closed or open Gustilo Anderson type 1 through 3B) were included. Simple sequential allocation was used for allotting the patients to two groups, one for interlocking nailing and other for plating. The patients were followed up for clinical, radiographic and functional results. Results: Forty patients with 41 involved limbs completed followup for one year. in our study was 19.55±0.69 weeks in case of interlocking nailing and 20.38±1.39 weeks in case of plating and there was no statistically significant difference between the two. Conclusion: There was no difference between the twomodalities in terms of fracture union. Complications were lesser but more serious in case of plating. Patient satisfaction was more with plating.
机译:背景:胫骨干骨折是成人中最常见的长骨骨折,最常见的是通过髓内环钉治疗。但是,一些荟萃分析表明,锁定钢板的人工合成在处理胫骨干端骨折方面同样有效,并且并发症的发生率也较低。目的:比较在结合,患者满意度和并发症方面进行的胫骨骨折固定和钉固定后的结果。材料和方法:2014年9月至2017年8月进行了Khwaja Yunus Ali医学学院和医院的非随机临床试验,其中包括胫骨的闭合或开放性干phy端或干phy端干phy端骨折(闭合或开放的Gustilo Anderson 1至3B型)。 。使用简单的顺序分配将患者分为两组,一组用于互锁钉子,另一组用于板钉。随访患者的临床,影像学和功能结果。结果:40例41肢累及患者完成了一年的随访。在我们的研究中,互锁钉为19.55±0.69周,镀层为20.38±1.39周,两者之间无统计学差异。结论:两种方式在骨折愈合方面没有差异。镀敷时并发症较少,但更为严重。电镀对患者的满意度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号