...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista CEFAC >Quality of life of students in speech, language and hearing sciences
【24h】

Quality of life of students in speech, language and hearing sciences

机译:语言,语言和听力科学学生的生活质量

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: to compare the quality of life (QoL) of speech therapy students in different undergraduate semesters and identify proposals for improvement. Methods: this is a cross-sectional, exploratory and descriptive study using a convenience sample. A total of 117 undergraduate students participated in the study and they were divided according to the undergraduate semester: G1 (n = 24) second semester, G2 (n = 33) fourth semester, G3 (n = 34) sixth semester and G4 (n = 26) eighth semester. The WHOQoL-Bref was the instrument used, which also included an open question: "How can the coordination of the Speech and Language Therapy Course contribute to the improvement of your quality of life?" The non-parametric statistical Kruskal Wallis test was used at significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). The absolute and relative frequencies of responses to the open question were calculated and categorised by specific and general content. Results: QoL was predominantly good (53.84%) and health satisfactory (49.57%). There was no statistically significant association between the groups (p > 0.05). QoL decreased in all domains from G2 to G3, increasing in G4. G3 had the worst QoL perception. Social relations and environment were the domains with the highest and lowest mean values, respectively. The highest percentage (40%) was in the category "5-year undergraduate course". Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the QoL between the undergraduate semesters, with the sixth semester being the worst. Social relations had the highest mean value, whereas environment the lowest.
机译:目的:比较不同本科生学期语言治疗学生的生活质量(QoL),并提出改进建议。方法:这是使用方便样本进行的横断面,探索性和描述性研究。共有117名本科生参加了研究,并根据本科生的学期进行了划分:G1(n = 24)第二学期,G2(n = 33)第四学期,G3(n = 34)第六学期和G4(n = 26)第八学期。 WHOQoL-Bref是使用的工具,它还包含一个开放的问题:“言语和语言治疗课程的协调如何有助于改善您的生活质量?”使用非参数统计Kruskal Wallis检验,显着性水平为5%(p <0.05)。根据特定和一般内容计算并回答公开问题的绝对和相对频率。结果:QoL总体良好(53.84%),健康满意(49.57%)。各组之间无统计学意义的相关性(p> 0.05)。从G2到G3的所有域中的QoL均降低,而在G4中则有所提高。 G3的QoL感知最差。社会关系和环境分别是平均值最高和最低的领域。最高百分比(40%)在“五年制本科课程”类别中。结论:本科生之间的QoL没有显着差异,第六学期是最差的。社会关系的平均值最高,而环境的平均值最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号