首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >Biomechanical analysis on transverse tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions
【24h】

Biomechanical analysis on transverse tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

机译:前交叉韧带重建中胫骨横向固定的生物力学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the combination of tibial cross pin fixation and femoral screw fixation presents biomechanical advantages when compared to femoral cross pin fixation and tibial screw fixation for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).METHODS: Thirty-eight porcine knees and bovine extensor digitorum tendons were used as the graft materials. The tests were performed in three groups: (1) standard, used fourteen knees, and the grafts were fixated with the combination of femoral cross pin and a tibial screw; (2) inverted, used fourteen knees with an inverted combination of tibial cross pin and a femoral screw; (3) control, ten control tests performed with intact ACL. After the grafts fixation, all the knees were subjected to tensile testing to determine yield strength and ultimate strength.RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in survival techniques in regard to strength, yield load and tension. There was a higher survival compared in the standard curves of yield stress (p 0.05).CONCLUSION: There is no biomechanical advantage, observed in animal models testing, in the combination of tibial cross pin fixation and femoral screw when compared to femoral cross pin fixation and tibial screw.
机译:目的:验证胫股交叉钉固定和股骨螺钉固定的组合与股交叉钉固定和胫骨螺钉固定的重建相比,在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中是否具有生物力学优势。方法:38只猪膝盖和牛伸指肌腱用作移植材料。试验分三组进行:(1)标准,使用十四个膝盖,并用股骨十字钉和胫骨螺钉固定移植物; (2)倒置,使用十四个膝盖,将胫骨交叉销和股骨螺钉倒置组合; (3)对照,使用完整的ACL进行十项对照测试。移植物固定后,对所有膝盖进行拉伸测试,以确定屈服强度和极限强度。结果:就强度,屈服负荷和张力而言,生存技术无统计学差异。结论:在动物模型测试中,与股骨交叉钉相比,胫骨交叉钉固定和股骨螺钉的结合没有生物力学优势,在动物模型测试中没有观察到生物力学的优势。固定和胫骨螺钉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号