首页> 外文期刊>Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor >Comparación de la eficacia en el alivio de dolor neuropático crónico agudizado con oxicodona más lidocaína intravenosas frente a tramadol más lidocaína intravenosas
【24h】

Comparación de la eficacia en el alivio de dolor neuropático crónico agudizado con oxicodona más lidocaína intravenosas frente a tramadol más lidocaína intravenosas

机译:静脉注射羟考酮加利多卡因与曲马多加静脉利多卡因加重慢性神经性疼痛的疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: We evaluated the efficiency of oxycodone plus lidocaine in comparison with tramadol plus lidocaine in continuous infusion in relieving acute neuropathic pain. Material and methods: Approval was granted by the local ethics committee of the General Hospital of Mexico (Num DIC/08/203/03/070) to perform a prospective, longitudinal, randomized, experimental clinical trial at the pain clinic and palliative care center. Twenty-seven patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe spontaneous acute neuropathic pain of any cause with onset at least 1 month previously, visual analogue scale of four or more, and no exclusion criteria were distributed in two groups: a study group (n = 14) which received oxycodone (10 mg) plus lidocaine (3 mg per kg) in continuous infusion and a control group (n = 13) which received tramadol (100 mg) plus lidocaine (3 mg per kg) in continuous infusion. Demographic variables, pain characteristics, diagnostic category, visual analogue scale for spontaneous pain, tactile allodynia, cold allodynia and hyperalgesia, level of sedation, adverse effects, treatment satisfaction and cardiovascular parameters were evaluated. The statistical analysis was performed with the Chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U-test using the SPSS version 11 statistical package. Results: The group treated with continuous infusion of oxycodone plus lidocaine showed significant changes in spontaneous pain at phases 7 and 8 of the study (p < 0.05). Significant changes were also found in diastolic blood pressure at phase 8 (p < 0.001). No significant changes were found in the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects or treatment satisfaction. No significant changes were found in heart rate or blood pressure in either of the two groups during the distinct study phases (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Continuous infusion of oxycodone plus lidocaine was safe, as demonstrated by cardiovascular stability, and had analgesic effects in relieving acute neuropathic pain compared with the control group. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate these results.
机译:目的:我们评估了羟考酮加利多卡因与曲马多加利多卡因连续输注缓解急性神经性疼痛的疗效。材料和方法:墨西哥总医院地方伦理委员会(Num DIC / 08/203/03/070)批准在痛苦诊所和姑息治疗中心进行一项前瞻性,纵向,随机,实验性临床试验。 27例诊断为任何原因的中重度自发性急性神经病性疼痛且至少在1个月前发作,视觉模拟评分为4或更高且无排除标准的患者分为两组:研究组( n = 14)连续输注接受羟考酮(10 mg)加利多卡因(每公斤3 mg),对照组(n = 13)接受连续输注曲马多(100 mg)加利多卡因(每公斤3 mg)。评估了人口统计学变量,疼痛特征,诊断类别,自发性疼痛,触觉性异常性疼痛,感性异常性疼痛和痛觉过敏的视觉模拟量表,镇静水平,不良反应,治疗满意度和心血管参数。使用SPSS 11版统计软件包使用卡方检验和曼恩惠特尼U检验进行统计分析。结果:在研究的第7阶段和第8阶段,连续输注羟考酮加利多卡因治疗的组显示出自发性疼痛的显着变化(p <0.05)。在第8阶段,舒张压也有显着变化(p <0.001)。在镇静水平,不良反应发生率或治疗满意度方面未发现明显变化。在不同的研究阶段中,两组的心率或血压均未见明显变化(p> 0.05)。结论:羟可待酮加利多卡因的持续输注是安全的,这通过心血管稳定性证明,与对照组相比,具有减轻急性神经性疼痛的镇痛作用。需要对更多患者进行进一步研究以验证这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号