首页> 外文期刊>Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor >Revisión del tratamiento con corticoides en el dolor de espalda según la medicina basada en la evidencia
【24h】

Revisión del tratamiento con corticoides en el dolor de espalda según la medicina basada en la evidencia

机译:循证医学综述皮质类固醇激素治疗腰痛

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of steroid injections associated or not with local anesthesia via the cervical, thoracic, lumbar or caudal epidural routes in cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral facet joints and spinal branches, as well as in the sacroiliac joint, in the treatment of back and upper and lower extremity pain. Material and methods: The following terms were used for the search: "epidural steroid injections or blocks", "caudal injections or blocks", "selective nerve root injections or blocks", "transforaminal injections or blocks", "facet injections or blocks", "medial nerve blocks" and "low back pain". The search was performed in the Trip Database, SUMSearch, National Guidelines Clearinghouse, Cochrane and centers drawing up clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines with levels of evidence, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and cross references among publications reviewed in Spanish or English from 1979 to 2009 were accepted. Results: Five clinical practice guidelines and nine systematic reviews were selected. Analysis of these articles indicated that intradiscal injections cannot be recommended in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The evidence on lumbar, cervical and thoracic medial branch injection in the treatment of lumbar, cervical and dorsal back pain is moderate for short- and long-term improvement. The evidence for sacroiliac joint injection is limited. Cervical interlaminar epidural injection provides significant and prolonged relief in chronic intractable cervical pain. There is level II-2 evidence for lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection, without fluoroscopy, in providing short-term relief and level II evidence for long-term relief. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection is effective in postlaminectomy syndrome (level IV evidence). There is moderate evidence for short- and long-term improvement in cervical radicular pain. Transforaminal epidural injection provides significant relief in chronic low back pain and radicular lumbar pain with level II-1 evidence for short-term improvement and level II-2 evidence for long-term improvement, with strong level 1C recommendation. Caudal epidural steroid injection was effective in producing short-term improvement (level II evidence) as well as long-term relief (level III evidence). Pain relief was achieved in postlaminectomy low back pain and spinal canal stenosis (level IV evidence). Conclusions: There are differences in the effectiveness, level of evidence and grade of recommendation for steroid use, associated or not with local anesthetics, according to the technique performed. Medial branch injection is more effective than facet joint injection. Epidural steroid injection is effective in back pain due to the different routes of access (interlaminar, transforaminal and caudal) when appropriately indicated and administered in well-selected patients. The most effective technique among those reviewed was intradiscal steroid injection. We recommend steroid administration as close as possible to the site of the lesion and the use of radiological vision to perform the distinct techniques, including epidural procedures.
机译:目的:评估通过颈,胸,腰或尾硬膜外途径在颈,胸,腰和小平面关节和脊柱分支以及joint关节中进行局部麻醉相关或未进行局部麻醉的类固醇注射的有效性。治疗背部及上,下肢疼痛。材料和方法:使用以下术语进行搜索:“硬膜外类固醇注射或阻滞”,“尾部注射或阻滞”,“选择性神经根注射或阻滞”,“经椎间孔注射或阻滞”,“小平面注射或阻滞” ,“中神经阻滞”和“腰痛”。搜索是在旅行数据库,SUMSearch,国家指南信息交换所,Cochrane和制定临床实践指南的中心中进行的。从1979年至2009年,接受西班牙语或英语审阅的出版物中的证据水平,系统评价,荟萃分析和交叉参考的临床实践指南被接受。结果:选择了五项临床实践指南和九项系统评价。对这些文章的分析表明,在慢性下腰痛的治疗中不建议使用椎间盘内注射。腰,颈和胸内侧支注射治疗腰,颈和背背痛的证据对于短期和长期的改善是中等的。 sa关节注射的证据有限。颈椎间盘硬膜外注射可在慢性顽固性颈痛中提供显着且长时间的缓解。有II-2级证据表明在不提供透视的情况下腰椎间盘硬膜内注射类固醇可以提供短期缓解,而II级证据则可以长期缓解。经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇激素对椎板切除术后综合征有效(Ⅳ级证据)。有适度的证据表明短期和长期改善了颈椎放射性疼痛。经椎间孔硬膜外注射可显着缓解慢性下腰痛和神经根性腰痛,II-1级证据表明短期改善,II-2级证据表明长期改善,强烈建议使用1C级。尾硬膜外类固醇注射剂可有效产生短期改善(II级证据)以及长期缓解(III级证据)。椎板切除术后腰痛和椎管狭窄症可减轻疼痛(IV级证据)。结论:根据所使用的技术,激素的使用效果,证据水平和推荐等级存在差异,与是否使用局麻药无关。内侧分支注射比小关节注射更有效。硬膜外注射类固醇是有效的背部疼痛由于访问的不同的途径(层间,经椎间孔和尾部)时适当地表示,并在良好的选择的患者施用。在审查的那些中,最有效的技术是椎间盘内类固醇注射。我们建议在距病变部位尽可能近的地方使用类固醇,并建议使用放射影像学来执行包括硬膜外手术在内的独特技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号