...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Comparison of transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injections for the treatment of chronic lumbar pain
【24h】

Comparison of transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injections for the treatment of chronic lumbar pain

机译:经椎间孔和椎板间硬膜外注射类固醇治疗慢性腰痛的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BEYAZ, Serbülent G?khan. Comparison of transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injections for the treatment of chronic lumbar pain. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. [online]. 2017, vol.67, n.1, pp.21-27. ISSN 0034-7094.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.06.003. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Objective: We compared the 12 month outcomes of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections with interlaminar epidural steroid injections for the treatment of chronic lumbar spinal pain. Chronic lower back pain is a multifactorial disorder with many possible etiologies. The lifetime prevalence of spinal pain is reportedly 65-80% in the neck and lower back. Epidural injection of corticosteroids is a commonly used intervention for managing chronic spinal pain. Methods: Patients who did not benefit from previous treatments were included in this study. Injections were performed according to magnetic resonance imaging findings at the nearest level of lumbar pathology; 173 patients received interlaminar epidural steroid injections and 126 patients received transforaminal epidural steroid injections. All of the patients were regularly followed up for 12 months using a verbal numeric rating scale. Magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, verbal numeric rating scale, and satisfaction scores were recorded. Results: Lumbar disk pathology was the most frequently encountered problem. The interlaminar epidural steroid injections were preferred at the L4-L5 intervertebral level. Verbal numeric rating scale scores significantly decreased during the 12-month period compared to basal scores (p < 0.001). Significant differences between the two groups according to verbal numeric rating scale and satisfaction scores were not observed (p > 0.05). There were no major complications; however, the interlaminar epidural steroid injections group had 22 (12.7%) minor complications, and the transforaminal epidural steroid injections group had 12 (9.5%) minor complications. Conclusions: This study showed that interlaminar epidural steroid injections can be as effective as transforaminal epidural steroid injections when performed at the nearest level of lumbar pathology using fluoroscopy in 12-month intervals.
机译:贝亚兹(BEYAZ),塞布伦特·格汗(SerbülentG?khan)。经椎间孔和层间硬膜外注射类固醇治疗慢性腰痛的比较。胸罩牧师茴香醚。 [线上]。 2017,Vol.67,n.1,第21-27页。 ISSN 0034-7094。? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.06.003。研究设计:横断面研究。目的:我们比较了透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇与层间硬膜外注射类固醇治疗慢性腰椎痛的12个月结果。慢性下腰痛是一种多因素疾病,病因很多。据报道,一生中颈部和下背部的脊柱疼痛患病率为65-80%。硬膜外注射皮质类固醇激素是治疗慢性脊柱疼痛的常用方法。方法:没有从以前的治疗中受益的患者包括在这项研究中。根据磁共振成像发现的最接近腰椎病理水平进行注射。 173例接受了层间硬膜外类固醇注射,126例接受了经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射。所有患者均定期接受口头数字评分表随访12个月。记录磁共振成像结果,并发症,口头数字评分量表和满意度得分。结果:腰椎间盘突出症是最常遇到的问题。在L4-L5椎间隙水平上,首选层间硬膜外注射类固醇。与基础评分相比,口头数字评分量表评分在12个月内显着降低(p <0.001)。两组在口头数字评分量表和满意度评分方面均未观察到显着差异(p> 0.05)。没有重大并发症。然而,层间硬膜外类固醇注射组有22例(12.7%)轻度并发症,经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射组有12例(9.5%)轻度并发症。结论:这项研究表明,当在最近的腰椎病理学水平上使用荧光检查法每隔12个月进行一次时,层间硬膜外注射类固醇与经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号