首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano >Respostas hemodinamicas ao exercício de for?a com restri??o de fluxo sanguíneo em pequenos grupos musculares
【24h】

Respostas hemodinamicas ao exercício de for?a com restri??o de fluxo sanguíneo em pequenos grupos musculares

机译:小肌肉群对有限运动的力量运动的血流动力学反应

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyze the acute hemodynamic responses to strength exercise with blood flow restriction involving small muscle groups. The sample consisted of 10 male volunteers (22.6 ± 2.07 years, 1.78 ± 0.06 m, 76.32 ± 13.36 kg) who randomly performed two experimental protocols involving the elbow flexion exercise with the dominant arm: strength exercise of the elbow flexors with blood flow restriction (EFBFR) and strength exercise of the elbow flexors without blood flow restriction (EEF). A cross-over design with a seven to ten days interval between the experimental protocols was used. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), heart rate (HR) and double product (DP) were evaluated at rest, immediately after exercise and at 15 minutes of recovery. SBP, DBP and MAP presented a significant increase (p 0.05) immediately after EFBFR when compared to the protocol without blood flow restriction, returning to rest values at the 15 minutes of recovery. DBP significantly reduced (p 0.05) in the recovery period only in the EFBFR experiment and HR increased post-effort in both experiments. The PP and DP did not change between the different times, regardless of the protocol.The results of the present study allow us to conclude that strength exercise with BFR involving small muscle groups was more efficient than exercise without BFR to promote acute changes in hemodynamic responses and that BFR did not represent a cardiovascular risk considering its effects on PP.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析对涉及小肌肉群的血流限制的力量运动的急性血液动力学反应。该样本由10位男性志愿者组成(22.6±2.07岁,1.78±0.06 m,76.32±13.36 kg),他们随机进行了两个实验方案,涉及用优势臂进行屈肘运动:限制血流的屈肘运动( EFBFR)和肘部屈肌的力量锻炼而无血流限制(EEF)。使用实验方案之间间隔为七至十天的交叉设计。在休息时,运动后和恢复15分钟后评估收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP)和平均值(MAP),脉压(PP),心率(HR)和双重乘积(DP)。与没有血流限制的方案相比,EFBFR后SBP,DBP和MAP显着增加(p <0.05),在恢复15分钟后恢复到静止值。仅在EFBFR实验中,DBP在恢复期显着降低(p <0.05),而在两个实验中HR均增加了努力。无论采用哪种方案,PP和DP在不同时间均无变化。本研究的结果使我们得出结论,BFR涉及小肌肉群的力量锻炼比BFR的力量锻炼更能促进血液动力学反应的急性变化。考虑到其对PP的影响,BFR并不代表心血管危险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号