首页> 外文期刊>Research on Humanities and Social Sciences >The Status of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Criminal Justice System under the Legal Frameworks of Ethiopia & Its Challenges
【24h】

The Status of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Criminal Justice System under the Legal Frameworks of Ethiopia & Its Challenges

机译:埃塞俄比亚法律框架下替代性争端解决(ADR)在刑事司法系统中的地位及其挑战

获取原文
       

摘要

This article intended to reveal the status of ADR in the criminal justice system under the legal frameworks of Ethiopia. Thus, the 1995 Constitution of the FDRE, the 1961 Criminal Procedure Code, the 2004 Criminal Code and the 2011 Criminal Justice Policy of Ethiopia are the primary concern of this study. Thus, systematic analysis of statutory provisions and legal principles involved therein, or derived there from, and logical and rational ordering of them is used as the main study mechanism. The result shows that the term ADR & what constitutes it in the context of criminal justice system; the parties that can play role in the process & their respective responsibilities; & the rights & duties of the crime victim & the offender the process; & the expected outcomes of the process are not clearly prescribed by law. Besides, there is inconsistency between the law and criminal justice policy of the country concerning the type of crimes subject to ADR.
机译:本文旨在揭示埃塞俄比亚法律框架下ADR在刑事司法系统中的地位。因此,埃塞俄比亚的1995年《 FDRE宪法》,1961年的《刑事诉讼法》,2004年的《刑法》和2011年的埃塞俄比亚刑事司法政策是本研究的主要关注点。因此,对其中或从中得出的法律规定和法律原则的系统分析以及对它们的逻辑和合理排序被用作主要的研究机制。结果表明,ADR一词及其在刑事司法系统中的构成;在过程中可以扮演角色的各方及其各自的责任;以及犯罪受害人和罪犯的权利和义务的过程;而且法律并未明确规定流程的预期结果。此外,该国的法律与刑事司法政策在ADR所涉及的犯罪类型方面不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号