首页> 外文期刊>Research on Humanities and Social Sciences >The Effect of Parenting Styles on Strengths of Humanity: Love, Kindness and Social Intelligence in Myanmar Adolescents
【24h】

The Effect of Parenting Styles on Strengths of Humanity: Love, Kindness and Social Intelligence in Myanmar Adolescents

机译:父母教养方式对人文优势的影响:缅甸青少年的爱,善良和社会智力

获取原文
           

摘要

The main purpose of this study was to explore the effect of parenting styles on strengths of humanity (love, kindness and social intelligence) in Myanmar adolescents. 378 students from three selected secondary schools participated in this study. The Scale of Parenting Styles developed by Gafoor and Kurkkan (2014) was used to measure parental responsiveness and control, for identifying parenting styles. Strengths of humanity were measured through 96-item Value in Action Inventory designed by Park and Peterson (2006). The results showed that adolescents perceived their mothers as more responsive and more controlling than their father. Perceptions with parental responsiveness and control were not different between boys and girls. Maternal responsiveness positively predicted strengths of love and kindness, while paternal control positively predicted social intelligence. Adolescents of authoritative mothers had higher scores in all humanity strengths than those of negligent mothers, and higher scores of kindness than those of permissive mothers. Similarly, adolescents of authoritative fathers reported higher scores in all humanity strengths than those of negligent fathers, and higher scores of kindness than those of permissive fathers. Adolescents of negligent mothers also revealed lower level of love than those of permissive mothers, while adolescents of negligent fathers revealed lower level of love than those of authoritarian fathers. In social intelligence, adolescents of negligent fathers were lower than their counterparts of parents who practiced other three styles. Adolescents of permissive and authoritarian styles did not show significant differences in all three strengths of humanity. On the whole, authoritative parenting style was the best, and negligent style was the worst.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是探讨父母教养方式对缅甸青少年人文优势(爱,善良和社会智慧)的影响。来自三所选定中学的378名学生参加了这项研究。由Gafoor和Kurkkan(2014)开发的父母养育方式量表用于衡量父母的反应能力和控制力,以识别父母养育方式。人类的力量是通过Park和Peterson(2006)设计的96项“行动中的价值清单”来衡量的。结果表明,与父亲相比,青少年认为母亲更敏感,更有控制力。父母对孩子的反应能力和控制感在男孩和女孩之间没有区别。产妇的反应积极地预测爱和友善的力量,而产妇的控制积极地预测社交能力。权威母亲的青少年在所有人文能力方面的得分都比疏忽母亲的得分高,而善良的得分则比宽容母亲的得分高。同样,权威父亲的青少年在所有人类方面的能力得分都比过失父亲的得分更高,而善良的得分则比宽容父亲的得分更高。疏忽大意的母亲的青少年也表现出比宽容母亲低的爱,而疏忽大意的父亲的青少年则表现出比专制父亲低的爱。在社会智力方面,过失父亲的青少年比实行其他三种风格的父母的青少年要低。宽容和专制的青少年在人类的所有三种力量上都没有表现出显着差异。总体而言,权威的育儿风格是最好的,而疏忽的育儿风格是最差的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号