首页> 外文期刊>Rehabilitation Research and Practice >Validity and Reproducibility of the Measurements Obtained Using the Flexicurve Instrument to Evaluate the Angles of Thoracic and Lumbar Curvatures of the Spine in the Sagittal Plane
【24h】

Validity and Reproducibility of the Measurements Obtained Using the Flexicurve Instrument to Evaluate the Angles of Thoracic and Lumbar Curvatures of the Spine in the Sagittal Plane

机译:使用flexicurve仪器评估矢状平面中脊柱的胸椎和腰椎弯曲角度获得的测量值的有效性和可重复性

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective. to verify the validity and reproducibility of using the flexicurve to measure the angles of the thoracic and lumbar curvatures.Method. 47 subjects were evaluated by: (1) palpation and marking of the spinous processes using lead markers, (2) using X-rays in the sagittal plane to measure the Cobb angles, (3) molding the flexicurve to the spine, and (4) drawing the contour of the flexicurve onto graph paper. The angle of curvature was determined with the flexicurve based on a 3rd order polynomial.Results. No differences were found between the Cobb angles and the angles obtained using the flexicurve in thoracic and lumbar curvatures (P>0.05). Correlations were strong and significant for the thoracic (r=0.72,P<0.01) and lumbar (r=0.60,P<0.01) curvatures. Excellent and significant correlations were found for both the intraevaluator and interevaluator measurements.Conclusion. The results show that there is no significant difference between the values obtained using the flexicurve and those obtained using the X-ray procedure and that there is a strong correlation between the two methods. This, together with the excellent level of inter- and intraevaluator reproducibility justifies its recommendation for use in clinical practice.
机译:目的。验证使用弯曲术测量胸椎和腰椎弯曲角度的有效性和可重复性。通过以下方式评估了47位受试者:(1)使用铅笔触诊并标记棘突,(2)在矢状平面中使用X射线测量Cobb角,(3)将弯曲弯曲成脊柱,和(4 )在方格纸上绘制弯曲曲线的轮廓。基于三阶多项式,用弯曲曲线确定曲率角。 Cobb角与使用弯曲术获得的胸曲和腰曲曲角之间无差异(P> 0.05)。胸曲度(r = 0.72,P <0.01)和腰曲度(r = 0.60,P <0.01)的相关性强且显着。在评估者内部和评估者之间的测量中发现了极好的和显着的相关性。结论。结果表明,使用弯曲曲线获得的值与使用X射线过程获得的值之间没有显着差异,并且两种方法之间存在很强的相关性。这与评估人员之间和评估人员之间的出色再现性相结合,证明了其在临床实践中的推荐用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号