首页> 外文期刊>Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology >Comparison of fluoroscopy time in different catheter-engagement approaches to graft vessels in post-coronary artery-bypass graft angiography
【24h】

Comparison of fluoroscopy time in different catheter-engagement approaches to graft vessels in post-coronary artery-bypass graft angiography

机译:冠状动脉旁路移植术后血管造影不同导管置入方法的荧光检查时间比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Although there is ongoing progress in coronary artery-bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention techniques and supplies, the risk of cardiac complications remains high compared with the normal population. Aim: In this study, our aim was to compare fluoroscopy times in engagement of three different catheters in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in post-CABG patients undergoing angiography. Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional, comparative study. We evaluated patients with previous CABG referred for invasive coronary diagnostic angiography. Patients having had SVG–obtuse marginal artery, SVG–diagonal, and SVG–posterior descending artery CABG were included. All patients underwent diagnostic angiography by each of a right diagnostic Judkins catheter, right modified Amplatz catheter, and right guiding Judkins catheter. Demographics and clinical history of patients and fluoroscopy time in different groups were evaluated. Results: A total of 61 patients were evaluated. The distribution of baseline characteristics in the three groups of our study was normal. Mean fluoroscopy time in SVG–obtuse marginal artery was 25.70±6.70 seconds in group A, 22.23±6.51 seconds in group B, and 17.35±7.82 seconds in group C. Mean total fluoroscopy time was 86.35±16.28 seconds in group A, 73.80±10.00 seconds in group B, and 51.90±10.22 seconds in group C, which was significant ( P 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggest that when we use the guiding Judkins catheter, fluoroscopy time decreases. However, more evaluations are needed with larger-scale studies and identification of other variables.
机译:背景:尽管冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)外科手术和经皮冠状动脉介入技术和补给技术仍在不断进步,但与正常人群相比,心脏并发症的风险仍然很高。目的:在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较接受CABG术后血管造影的大隐静脉移植物(SVG)中三种不同导管接合的透视时间。方法:这是一项单中心,横断面的比较研究。我们评估了先前进行介入性冠状动脉造影造影的CABG患者。包括患有SVG钝性边缘动脉,SVG对角线和SVG后降动脉CABG的患者。所有患者均通过右诊断Judkins导管,右改良Amplatz导管和右引导Judkins导管进行诊断性血管造影。评价了不同人群的人口统计学和临床​​病史以及透视时间。结果:共评估61例患者。在我们研究的三组中基线特征的分布是正常的。 SVG钝性边缘动脉的平均透视时间为A组为25.70±6.70秒,B组为22.23±6.51秒,C组为17.35±7.82秒。A组的总透视时间为86.35±16.28秒,A组为73.80± B组为10.00秒,C组为51.90±10.22秒,差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论:我们的数据表明,当我们使用Judkins导尿管时,透视时间会减少。但是,更大规模的研究和其他变量的识别需要更多的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号