首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology >Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
【24h】

Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.

机译:美国人类服务(HHS)地区和大都市大区域内利用胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Anecdotal evidence suggests that US practice patterns for ART differ by geographical region. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of ICSI differs by region and to evaluate whether these rates are correlated with differences in live birth rates. Methods Public data for 2012 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinics with ≥100 fresh, non-donor cycles were grouped by 10 nationally recognized Department of Health & Human Services regions and 11 metropolitan Megaregions and were compared for use of ICSI, frequency of male factor?infertility, and live birth rate in women Results There were 274 clinics in the Health & Human Services regions and 247 in the Megaregions. ICSI utilization rates in Health & Human Services groups ranged between 52.5–78.2% ( P 2?=?0.2096; P =?0.18) per cycle. For Megaregions, rates of ICSI per cycle differed (63.4%–93.5%, P 2?=?0.5347; P =?0.01). Highest rates of ICSI occurred in Front Range (93.5%) and Gulf Coast (83.1%) Megaregions. Lowest rates occurred in the Northeast (63.4%) and Florida (64.8%) Megaregions. Male factor infertility rates did not differ across regions. Conclusions ICSI utilization and live birth rates per cycle for each clinic group were significantly different across geographical regions of the U.S. However, higher ICSI utilization rate was not associated with higher rates of male factor infertility nor were they strongly correlated with higher live birth rates per cycle. Studies are needed to understand factors that may influence ICSI overutilization in the U.S.
机译:背景轶事证据表明,美国抗逆转录病毒疗法的实践模式因地理区域而异。这项研究的目的是确定ICSI的使用是否因地区而异,并评估这些比率是否与活产率的差异相关。方法2012年的公共数据来自疾病预防控制中心。按10个国家公认的卫生与公共服务部地区和11个大城市特大地区对≥100个新鲜的,非捐赠者周期的诊所进行分组,并比较了ICSI的使用,男性不育频率和女性活产率卫生与公共服务区域有274个诊所,大区域有247个。卫生与公共服务小组的ICSI利用率为每个周期52.5-78.2%(P 2 ?=?0.2096; P =?0.18)。对于大区域,每个周期的ICSI发生率有所不同(63.4%–93.5%,P 2 ?=?0.5347; P =?0.01)。 ICSI发生率最高的地区是前线地区(93.5%)和墨西哥湾沿岸地区(83.1%)。发生率最低的地区是东北(63.4%)和佛罗里达(64.8%)特大区域。男性因素不育率在各个地区之间没有差异。结论在美国不同地区,每个门诊组的ICSI利用率和每个周期的活产率显着不同。但是,较高的ICSI利用率与较高的男性不育率无关,也不与每个周期的活产率高相关。需要进行研究以了解可能影响美国ICSI过度使用的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号