首页> 外文期刊>Language Testing in Asia >Calibrating the CEFR against the China Standards of English for College English vocabulary education in China
【24h】

Calibrating the CEFR against the China Standards of English for College English vocabulary education in China

机译:根据中国英语标准对中国大学英语词汇教育中的CEFR进行校准

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (Council of Europe 2001) has, over the past decade, come to be widely used as a reference tool for teaching, learning and assessment (Alderson 2002; North 2014). The focus of the current study is on scaling the China Standards of English (CSE) vocabulary descriptors for College English education in Mainland China, where College English education refers to English language education for non-English major students at tertiary level. A review of the CEFR and the College English Curriculum Requirements (CECR) (Ministry of Education 2007) indicated that the vocabulary descriptors in both documents were inadequate to describe vocabulary knowledge for College English education in China. Method On the basis of the CEFR and CECR descriptors, a pool of 39 descriptors were collected and categorized. Twenty-two English teachers from a Mainland China university were invited to participate in the study. They were first given the CEFR and CECR vocabulary descriptors, after which they were asked to scale the descriptors with the CEFR as the reference point. Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement (MFRM) was used to validate teachers’ scaling of the vocabulary descriptors. Results The MFRM analysis showed that while the descriptors at C1 level were generally ranked as expected, teachers had difficulties in ranking descriptors at the CEFR B1, B1+ and B2 levels. Conclusion The study indicates that teacher judgement of the scales provides evidence of the CSE scales, and can be a source of valuable information for the future improvement of the CSE.
机译:背景知识过去十年来,欧洲共同参考框架(CEFR)(欧洲理事会,2001年)已被广泛用作教学,学习和评估的参考工具(Alderson 2002; North 2014)。当前研究的重点是为中国大陆的大学英语教育缩放中国英语标准(CSE)词汇描述符,其中大学英语教育是指针对非英语专业大专生的英语教育。对CEFR和《大学英语课程要求》(CECR)的审查(教育部,2007年)表明,两个文档中的词汇描述符都不足以描述中国大学英语教育的词汇知识。方法根据CEFR和CECR描述符,收集并分类了39个描述符。来自中国内地大学的22名英语教师应邀参加了研究。首先给他们提供了CEFR和CECR词汇描述符,然后要求他们以CEFR为参考点对描述符进行缩放。多重Rasch测量(MFRM)用于验证教师对词汇描述符的缩放。结果MFRM分析表明,尽管C1级别的描述符通常按预期进行排名,但教师在CEFR B1,B1 +和B2级别的描述符排名方面存在困难。结论研究表明,教师对量表的判断为CSE量表提供了证据,并且可以为CSE的未来改进提供有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号