...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrients >A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures
【24h】

A Systematic Review of Athletes’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge and Reflections on the Quality of Current Nutrition Knowledge Measures

机译:对运动员和教练的营养知识进行系统回顾以及对当前营养知识措施质量的思考

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: Nutrition knowledge can influence dietary choices and impact on athletic performance. Valid and reliable measures are needed to assess the nutrition knowledge of athletes and coaches. Objectives: (1) To systematically review the published literature on nutrition knowledge of adult athletes and coaches and (2) to assess the quality of measures used to assess nutrition knowledge. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscuss, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Study Selection: 36 studies that provided a quantitative measure of nutrition knowledge and described the measurement tool that was used were included. Data extraction: Participant description, questionnaire description, results (mean correct and responses to individual items), study quality, and questionnaire quality. Data synthesis: All studies were of neutral quality. Tools used to measure knowledge did not consider health literacy, were outdated with regards to consensus recommendations, and lacked appropriate and adequate validation. The current status of nutrition knowledge in athletes and coaches is difficult to ascertain. Gaps in knowledge also remain unclear, but it is likely that energy density, the need for supplementation, and the role of protein are frequently misunderstood. Conclusions: Previous reports of nutrition knowledge need to be interpreted with caution. A new, universal, up-to-date, validated measure of general and sports nutrition knowledge is required to allow for assessment of nutrition knowledge.
机译:背景:营养知识会影响饮食选择并影响运动表现。需要有效和可靠的措施来评估运动员和教练的营养知识。目标:(1)系统地审查已发表的有关成人运动员和教练的营养知识的文献,以及(2)评估用于评估营养知识的措施的质量。数据来源:MEDLINE,CINAHL,SPORTDiscuss,Web of Science和SCOPUS。研究选择:包括36项研究,这些研究提供了营养知识的定量测量并描述了所使用的测量工具。数据提取:参与者描述,问卷描述,结果(均值和对单个项目的回答),研究质量和问卷质量。数据综合:所有研究均为中性。用于衡量知识的工具并未考虑健康素养,在共识性建议方面已经过时,并且缺乏适当和充分的验证。运动员和教练中营养知识的现状很难确定。知识上的差距也仍然不清楚,但是很可能人们常常误解了能量密度,补充营养和蛋白质的作用。结论:以前关于营养知识的报告应谨慎解释。需要一种新的,通用的,经过验证的常规营养和运动营养知识的措施,以便评估营养知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号