首页> 外文期刊>Nursing of intrgrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine(Zhong-Xiyi Jiehe Huli ) >3种评估量表对术中急性压疮预测能力的比较研究
【24h】

3种评估量表对术中急性压疮预测能力的比较研究

机译:3种评估量表对术中急性压疮预测能力的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract:Objective To compare the value of Braden scale, Norton scale and Waterlow scale in predicting the risk of intraoperative acute pressure ulcers in patients with selective operation. Methods A total of 383 patients with selective operation in surgical ward were selected and evaluated by three scales before preoperative interview. The sensitivity and best diagnosis cutoff point of each assessment was compared. Results Out of 383 patients, 21 cases (5.48%) were diagnosed as intraoperative acute pressure ulcers occurred in one area of body. Only one case (4.76%) had stage Ⅱ pressure ulcer at the hip. Pressure ulcers were the mostly occurred in sacrococcygeal region in 12 cases (57.14%). The best diagnosis cutoff points of Braden, Norton and Waterlow scales were 16, 18 and 14 score respectively, and the corresponding AUC of ROC were 0.635, 0.717 and 0.624 respectively. Conclusion Norton scale is recommended as the first choice to estimate the risk of acute pressure ulcers in patients with selective operation.
机译:摘要:目的比较布拉登量表,诺顿量表和沃特洛量表在预测选择性手术患者术中急性压疮风险中的价值。方法对383例病房选择性手术患者进行术前访谈前的3个量表的评价。比较每个评估的敏感性和最佳诊断临界点。结果在383例患者中,有21例(5.48%)被诊断为在一个身体部位发生了术中急性压疮。髋部Ⅱ度压疮只有1例(4.76%)。 sa尾区以压疮为主,占12例(57.14%)。 Braden,Norton和Waterlow量表的最佳诊断临界点分别为16、18和14分,相应的ROC的AUC分别为0.635、0.717和0.624。结论推荐诺顿量表作为评估选择性手术患者急性压疮风险的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号