首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy >The making of a professional academic: an analysis of Swedish doctoral supervision policy
【24h】

The making of a professional academic: an analysis of Swedish doctoral supervision policy

机译:专业学者的培养:瑞典博士生监督政策的分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The general aim of this article is to develop an understanding of the historical and contemporary frames for professional socialisation through doctoral supervision. Supervision is a crucial component of doctoral education, in the reproduction of future researchers and a research competent labour force. Special attention is directed towards Swedish doctoral supervision policy. Sweden shares the characteristics of a social democratic type of welfare regime in which national politics takes a special responsibility for and interest in higher education including doctoral education. In government policy texts providing the basis for two major reforms of doctoral education, in 1969 and 1998, we map and analyse what is expressed about supervision and its context, and how this is expressed, paying attention to both similarities and differences. Drawing on a governance perspective, including a critical policy analysis, we discuss the findings in terms of frames for the professional socialisation of doctoral students. In both reforms, we recognise a dominant supervision ideal which emphasises efficiency, but it is complemented and partly challenged by very different ideals: in 1969 by an academic ideal and in 1998 by an ideal promoting good doctoral working conditions. Altogether, this implies a shift in the framing of professional socialisation from emphasising efficiency as a matter of compliance to efficiency as a matter of interaction and cooperation.
机译:本文的总体目的是通过博士生监督来了解专业社会化的历史框架和当代框架。在培养未来的研究人员和具有研究能力的劳动力方面,监督是博士教育的重要组成部分。特别注意的是瑞典的博士生监督政策。瑞典具有社会民主型福利制度的特征,在这种制度中,国家政治对包括博士教育在内的高等教育负有特殊责任并对其产生了兴趣。在政府政策文本中,为1969年和1998年的两次博士教育改革提供了基础,我们绘制并分析了有关监督及其背景的表述以及表述的方式,同时注意了异同。基于治理的观点,包括关键的政策分析,我们以博士生的专业社交化为框架讨论了研究结果。在这两项改革中,我们认识到强调效率的主导性监督理想,但又受到非常不同的理想的补充和部分挑战:1969年,一个学术理想; 1998年,一个促进良好博士工作条件的理想。总而言之,这意味着专业社会化的框架已从强调效率(遵从法规)到效率(相互作用和合作)转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号