首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Laboratory Medicine >Haemoglobin Screening Methods in Blood Donors- Where Do We Stand Now?
【24h】

Haemoglobin Screening Methods in Blood Donors- Where Do We Stand Now?

机译:献血者中的血红蛋白筛选方法-我们现在站在哪里?

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Haemoglobin screening is one of the most important screening tests done for blood donors in order to prevent blood collection from an anaemic donor and ensure an optimum quality of blood product for the recipients. Therefore, it is essential, that an accurate and reliable method for haemoglobin determination among the whole blood donors is selected and established. Aim: To assess the utility and efficacy of the haemoglobin screening methods in blood donors in our institutional setting and to find out the best method taking into account time, cost effectiveness and accuracy of results. Materials and Methods: This is a single centre-based analytical cross-sectional study of pre-donation screening for whole blood donors in the blood bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital at Durgapur, West Bengal, India. A total of 100 consenting potential donors were screened according to the criteria laid down by Drugs and Cosmetic Act of India, 1940. Blood sample which is routinely collected from the blood donors for screening purpose was tested for haemoglobin estimation using three different screening methods viz., Copper Sulphate method, HemoCue method and Automated Haematology Analyser. The results were analysed using statistical formulae to obtain the specificity, sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy. Results: The accuracy of HemoCue (97%) was found to be higher than the Copper Sulphate method (92%). Comparing the cost per test, Copper Sulphate method was the most affordable with 5 INR/test, HemoCue and Automated Haematology Cell Analyser at 25 INR/test each. Taking into account the time taken by the methods, we found that HemoCue took the least time for screening a blood sample, followed by the Copper Sulphate method. Conclusion: Taking into account the efficacy, utility, time taken and cost effectiveness, HemoCue was found to be an appropriate screening method for pre-donation estimation of haemoglobin content in majority of blood donation setups. However, in economically poor areas, Copper Sulphate method can be used but HemoCue method should be employed for those who fail the former method, so as to avoid unnecessary deferrals.
机译:简介:血红蛋白筛查是对献血者进行的最重要的筛查测试之一,目的是防止从贫血的献血者身上收集血液并确保接受者的血液制品具有最佳质量。因此,至关重要的是选择并建立一种准确可靠的全血供血者血红蛋白测定方法。目的:在我们的机构环境中评估血红蛋白筛查方法在献血者中的效用和功效,并在考虑时间,成本效益和结果准确性的情况下找到最佳方法。材料和方法:这是印度西孟加拉邦杜尔加布尔一家三级护理教学医院血库中针对全血供者进行全血捐献者筛查的单中心基础分析性横断面研究。根据印度《药品和化妆品法案》(1940年)规定的标准,共筛选了100个同意的潜在供体。使用三种不同的筛选方法,即常规地从供血者那里收集的血液样本进行了血红蛋白评估,以进行血红蛋白评估。 ,硫酸铜法,HemoCue法和自动血液学分析仪。使用统计公式对结果进行分析,以获得特异性,敏感性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。结果:发现HemoCue的准确性(97%)高于硫酸铜法(92%)。与每次测试的成本相比,硫酸铜法是最实惠的,每次测试5 INR,HemoCue和自动血液细胞分析仪,每次25 INR。考虑到这些方法所花费的时间,我们发现HemoCue花费最少的时间来筛查血液样本,其次是硫酸铜方法。结论:考虑到疗效,效用,时间和成本效益,HemoCue被认为是在大多数献血机构中进行献血前估计血红蛋白含量的合适筛选方法。但是,在经济贫困地区,可以使用硫酸铜法,但对于那些未能采用前者的人,应使用HemoCue法,以避免不必要的延期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号