首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up
【24h】

Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up

机译:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)与文拉法辛ER治疗抑郁症的比较:一项随机,双盲,单中心,开放标签,随访的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a relatively new neuromodulation approach, provides some evidence of an antidepressant effect. This randomized, 4-week, double-blind study with 8-week, open-label, follow-up compared the efficacy and tolerability of left anodal tDCS with venlafaxine ER (VNF) in the treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. Methods: Subjects (n = 57) received tDCS (2 mA, 20 sessions, 30 mins) plus placebo (n = 29) or VNF plus sham tDCS (n = 28). Responders to both interventions entered the open-label follow-up. The primary outcome was score change in the Montgomery–?sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 4 of the study. Secondary outcomes were response, remission, dropout rates and relapse rates within the follow-up.The mean change in the MADRS score from baseline to week for patients treated with tDCS was 7.69 (95% CI, 5.09–10.29) points and 9.64 (95% CI, 6.20–13.09) points for patients from the VNF group, a nonsignificant difference (1.95, 95% CI ?2.25–6.16; t (55) = 0.93, p= 0.36, Cohen′s d = 0.24). There were no significant between-group differences in the MADRS scores from baseline to endpoint (intention-to-treat analysis). The response/remission rate for tDCS (24%/17%) and VNF (43%/32%) as well as the dropout rate (tDCS/VNF; 6/6) did not differ significantly between groups. In the follow-up, relapse (tDCS/VNF; 1/2) and dropout (tDCS/VNF; 2/3) rates were low and comparable. Limitations: A relatively small sample size and short duration of the antidepressant treatment; no placebo arm. Conclusion: Overall, this study found a similar efficacy of tDCS and VNF in the acute treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. The real clinical usefulness of tDCS and its optimal parameters in the treatment of depression should be further validated.
机译:目的:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种相对较新的神经调节方法,为抗抑郁作用提供了一些证据。这项为期4周,开放标签,为期4周的随机,双盲研究比较了左阳极tDCS与文拉法辛ER(VNF)在治疗抑郁症和预防早期复发中的疗效和耐受性。方法:受试者(n = 57)接受tDCS(2 mA,20次疗程,30分钟)加安慰剂(n = 29)或VNF加假tDCS(n = 28)。两种干预措施的回应者都接受了开放标签的随访。主要结果是在研究的第4周,蒙哥马利?sberg抑郁评分量表(MADRS)的得分变化。次要结果是随访期间的反应,缓解,辍学率和复发率。tDCS治疗的患者从基线到一周的MADRS得分平均变化为7.69(95%CI,5.09-10.29)点和9.64(95) VNF组患者的CI为6.20–13.09),无显着性差异(1.95,95%CI为2.25–6.16; t(55)= 0.93,p = 0.36,Cohen'sd = 0.24)。从基线到终点(意向性治疗分析)的MADRS评分在组间没有显着差异。两组间tDCS(24%/ 17%)和VNF(43%/ 32%)的应答/缓解率以及辍学率(tDCS / VNF; 6/6)均无显着差异。在随访中,复发率(tDCS / VNF; 1/2)和辍学率(tDCS / VNF; 2/3)较低且相当。局限性:抗抑郁药的样本量相对较小且持续时间短;没有安慰剂手臂。结论:总体而言,该研究发现tDCS和VNF在急性抑郁症治疗和预防早期复发中具有相似的疗效。 tDCS的实际临床价值及其在抑郁症治疗中的最佳参数应得到进一步验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号