...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychopharmacology >Comparison of the Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine and Cocaine|[sol]|Heroin Combinations under Progressive Ratio and Choice Schedules in Rats
【24h】

Comparison of the Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine and Cocaine|[sol]|Heroin Combinations under Progressive Ratio and Choice Schedules in Rats

机译:可卡因和可卡因| [sol] |海洛因组合在大鼠进阶比和选择方案下的增强作用比较

获取原文

摘要

The co-use of cocaine and heroin is relatively common, with a growing clinical and preclinical literature dedicated to investigating the factors underlying the phenomenon. Specifically, several studies have compared the reinforcing effects of the coadministration of cocaine and heroin, referred to commonly as 'speedball', to either drug alone. The present study assessed whether addition of heroin to a wide range of cocaine doses produces reinforcing effects greater than cocaine alone using both a progressive ratio (PR) schedule and a choice procedure. Patterns of coadministration of cocaine and heroin offered simultaneously were also assessed using double-lumen cannulas. Under the PR schedule, speedball combinations across a range of doses (0.38–3.0 mg/kg/inf cocaine+1.5–48 g/kg/inf heroin) did not support higher break points than cocaine alone. When cocaine and heroin were made available concurrently (ie on two separate levers), rats self-administered cocaine exclusively. Using a choice procedure, however, a preference was demonstrated for some speedball combinations (eg 0.18 mg/kg/inf cocaine+50 g/kg/inf heroin; 0.38 mg/kg/inf cocaine+50 g/kg/inf heroin) over cocaine alone (0.75 mg/kg/inf). So while results obtained using the PR schedule do not support the hypothesis that speedball combinations are more reinforcing than cocaine alone, data from the choice procedure do support this hypothesis. These apparently discrepant results demonstrate that these models are measuring different aspects of drug reinforcement, and suggest that choice procedures in rats provide a useful tool to study speedball self-administration.
机译:可卡因和海洛因的共同使用相对普遍,越来越多的临床和临床前文献致力于研究该现象的潜在因素。具体来说,几项研究已将可卡因和海洛因共同给药(通常称为“速球”)与单独使用两种药物的增强作用进行了比较。本研究使用渐进比率(PR)方案和选择程序评估了在广泛剂量的可卡因中添加海洛因是否比单独使用可卡因产生更大的增强作用。同时使用双腔插管评估了同时提供的可卡因和海洛因的共同给药方式。根据PR时间表,速球的各种剂量组合(0.38–3.0 mg / kg / inf可卡因+ 1.5–48 g / kg / inf海洛因)与单独的可卡因相比,其断裂点更高。当同时提供可卡因和海洛因时(即在两个独立的杠杆上),大鼠仅自行施用可卡因。但是,使用选择程序证明了某些速球组合(例如0.18 mg / kg / inf可卡因+50 g / kg / inf海洛因; 0.38 mg / kg / inf可卡因+50 g / kg / inf海洛因)的偏好仅可卡因(0.75 mg / kg / inf)。因此,尽管使用PR时间表获得的结果不支持以下假设,即速球组合比单独使用可卡因更能增强人身安全,但来自选择程序的数据确实支持了这一假设。这些明显不同的结果表明,这些模型正在测量药物强化的不同方面,并且表明大鼠的选择程序为研究快球自我管理提供了有用的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号