...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular Cancer >Inhibition of HSP27 alone or in combination with pAKT inhibition as therapeutic approaches to target SPARC-induced glioma cell survival
【24h】

Inhibition of HSP27 alone or in combination with pAKT inhibition as therapeutic approaches to target SPARC-induced glioma cell survival

机译:HSP27的单独抑制或与pAKT抑制的结合作为靶向SPARC诱导的神经胶质瘤细胞存活的治疗方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The current treatment regimen for glioma patients is surgery, followed by radiation therapy plus temozolomide (TMZ), followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Despite this aggressive treatment regimen, the overall survival of all surgically treated GBM patients remains dismal, and additional or different therapies are required. Depending on the cancer type, SPARC has been proposed both as a therapeutic target and as a therapeutic agent. In glioma, SPARC promotes invasion via upregulation of the p38 MAPK /MAPKAPK2/HSP27 signaling pathway, and promotes tumor cell survival by upregulating pAKT. As HSP27 and AKT interact to regulate the activity of each other, we determined whether inhibition of HSP27 was better than targeting SPARC as a therapeutic approach to inhibit both SPARC -induced glioma cell invasion and survival. Results Our studies found the following. 1) SPARC increases the expression of tumor cell pro-survival and pro-death protein signaling in balance, and, as a net result, tumor cell survival remains unchanged. 2) Suppressing SPARC increases tumor cell survival, indicating it is not a good therapeutic target. 3) Suppressing HSP27 decreases tumor cell survival in all gliomas, but is more effective in SPARC -expressing tumor cells due to the removal of HSP27 inhibition of SPARC -induced pro-apoptotic signaling. 4) Suppressing total AKT1/2 paradoxically enhanced tumor cell survival, indicating that AKT1 or 2 are poor therapeutic targets. 5) However, inhibiting pAKT suppresses tumor cell survival. 6) Inhibiting both HSP27 and pAKT synergistically decreases tumor cell survival. 7) There appears to be a complex feedback system between SPARC , HSP27, and AKT. 8) This interaction is likely influenced by PTEN status. With respect to chemosensitization, we found the following. 1) SPARC enhances pro-apoptotic signaling in cells exposed to TMZ. 2) Despite this enhanced signaling, SPARC protects cells against TMZ. 3) This protection can be reduced by inhibiting pAKT. 4) Combined inhibition of HSP27 and pAKT is more effective than TMZ treatment alone. Conclusions We conclude that inhibition of HSP27 alone, or in combination with pAKT inhibitor IV, may be an effective therapeutic approach to inhibit SPARC -induced glioma cell invasion and survival in SPARC -positive/ PTEN -wildtype and SPARC -positive/ PTEN -null tumors, respectively.
机译:背景技术目前,胶质瘤患者的治疗方案是手术,然后放疗加替莫唑胺(TMZ),再辅以6个月的TMZ辅助治疗。尽管采取了这种积极的治疗方案,所有接受手术治疗的GBM患者的总体存活率仍然令人沮丧,并且需要其他或不同的治疗方法。根据癌症类型,已经提出了SPARC作为治疗靶标和治疗剂。在神经胶质瘤中,SPARC通过上调p38 MAPK / MAPKAPK2 / HSP27信号通路促进侵袭,并通过上调pAKT促进肿瘤细胞存活。由于HSP27和AKT相互作用以相互调节彼此的活性,因此我们作为抑制SPARC诱导的神经胶质瘤细胞侵袭和存活的治疗方法,确定对HSP27的抑制是否优于靶向SPARC。结果我们的研究发现以下内容。 1)SPARC平衡地增加了肿瘤细胞的生存前和死亡蛋白信号传导的表达,因此,最终,肿瘤细胞的生存率保持不变。 2)抑制SPARC可增加肿瘤细胞的存活率,表明它不是一个好的治疗靶标。 3)抑制HSP27降低了所有神经胶质瘤中的肿瘤细胞存活,但是由于去除了对SPARC诱导的促凋亡信号的HSP27抑制,所以在表达SPARC的肿瘤细胞中更有效。 4)抑制总AKT1 / 2矛盾地提高了肿瘤细胞的存活率,表明AKT1或2是较差的治疗靶标。 5)然而,抑制pAKT会抑制肿瘤细胞的存活。 6)抑制HSP27和pAKT协同降低肿瘤细胞的存活率。 7)SPARC,HSP27和AKT之间似乎存在一个复杂的反馈系统。 8)这种相互作用很可能受PTEN状态的影响。关于化学增敏,我们发现以下内容。 1)SPARC增强了暴露于TMZ的细胞中促凋亡信号转导。 2)尽管有这种增强的信令,SPARC仍可以保护小区免受TMZ的攻击。 3)可以通过抑制pAKT来减少这种保护。 4)HSP27和pAKT的联合抑制比单独的TMZ治疗更有效。结论我们得出结论,单独抑制HSP27或与pAKT抑制剂IV联合使用,可能是抑制SPARC阳性/ PTEN野生型和SPARC阳性/ PTEN无效型肿瘤中SPARC诱导的胶质瘤细胞侵袭和存活的有效治疗方法。 , 分别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号