...
首页> 外文期刊>Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology >EX-PRESS? Implant Position and Function: Comparative Evaluation with Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography
【24h】

EX-PRESS? Implant Position and Function: Comparative Evaluation with Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography

机译:表现?植入物的位置和功能:超声生物显微镜和光学相干断层扫描技术的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) for the imaging of EX-PRESS? implant. Materials and Methods: This nonrandomized comparative case series was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. The Ellex Eye Cubed (40 MHz) UBM and the Zeiss Visante OCT systems were used. The filtering bleb morphology (BL), aqueous outflow (AS), and tube position (TB) were evaluated by two independent observers using a quality scale of 1 (worst) to 4 (best). Data were also collected on corneal and iris clearance from the tip of the tube (CC and IC, respectively). Data from both the devices were statistically analyzed. P ? implant were examined. TB, AS, and BL scores using UBM were 2.40 ± 0.39, 3.45 ± 0.72, and 2.45 ± 0.64, respectively. TB, AS, and BL scores for OCT were 3.35 ± 0.41, 1.55 ± 0.43, and 2.55 ± 0.55, respectively. AS was significantly higher with UBM whereas the opposite was true for TB. Differences in BL between OCT and UBM were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Imaging of the EX-PRESS? implant is feasible with both UBM and OCT. Both modalities allow visualization of the position of the implant tube in relation to the iris or cornea and delineate the internal structure of the filtering bleb.
机译:目的:本研究评估了前节光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和超声生物显微镜(UBM)对EX-PRESS ?植入物成像的可行性。材料和方法:该非随机比较病例系列是在希腊克里特岛伊拉克利翁大学医院眼科进行的。使用了Ellex眼立方(40 MHz)UBM和Zeiss Visante OCT系统。两位独立的观察者使用1(最差)至4(最佳)的质量等级对滤过泡形态(BL),水流出(AS)和管位置(TB)进行了评估。还收集了来自管尖(分别为CC和IC)的角膜和虹膜清除率的数据。对两个设备的数据进行了统计分析。检查P?植入物。使用UBM的TB,AS和BL评分分别为2.40±0.39、3.45±0.72和2.45±0.64。 OCT的TB,AS和BL评分分别为3.35±0.41、1.55±0.43和2.55±0.55。 UBM的AS显着升高,而TB则相反。 OCT和UBM之间的BL差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论:利用UBM和OCT对EX-PRESS ?植入物进行成像是可行的。两种方式都可以观察到植入管相对于虹膜或角膜的位置,并描绘出滤泡的内部结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号