首页> 外文期刊>Minerals >An Investigation of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a Cemented Hydraulic Backfill Made of Alluvial Sand
【24h】

An Investigation of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a Cemented Hydraulic Backfill Made of Alluvial Sand

机译:冲积砂水泥水回填的单轴抗压强度研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Backfill is commonly used in underground mines. The quality control of the backfill is a key step to ensure it meets the designed strength requirement. This is done through sample collection from the underground environment, followed by uniaxial compression tests to obtain the Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) in the laboratory. When the cylindrical cemented backfill samples are axially loaded to failure, several failure modes can be observed and mainly classified into diagonal shear failure and axial split failure. To date, the UCS obtained by these two failure modes are considered to be the same with no distinction between them. In this paper, an analysis of the UCS results obtained on a cemented hydraulic backfill made of alluvial sand at a Canadian underground mine over the course of more than three years is presented. The results show that the UCS values obtained by diagonal shear failure are generally higher than those obtained by axial split failure for samples with the same recipe and curing time. This highlights the importance of making a distinction between the UCS values obtained by the two different modes of failure. Their difference in failure mechanism is explained. Further investigations on the sources of the data dispersion tend to indicate that the UCS obtained by laboratory tests following the current practice may not be representative of the in-situ strength distribution in the underground stopes due to segregation in cemented hydraulic backfill.
机译:回填通常用于地下矿山。回填的质量控制是确保其满足设计强度要求的关键步骤。这是通过从地下环境中收集样品,然后进行单轴压缩测试来获得实验室中的单轴压缩强度(UCS)来完成的。当圆柱状水泥回填样品轴向加载至破坏时,可以观察到几种破坏模式,主要分为对角剪切破坏和轴向劈裂破坏。迄今为止,通过这两种故障模式获得的UCS被认为是相同的,没有区别。本文对三年多来加拿大某地下矿山中由冲积砂制成的胶结水力回填所获得的UCS结果进行了分析。结果表明,对于具有相同配方和固化时间的样品,通过对角剪切破坏获得的UCS值通常高于通过轴向分裂破坏获得的UCS值。这突出了区分由两种不同故障模式获得的UCS值的重要性。解释了它们在故障机制上的差异。对数据分散源的进一步研究倾向于表明,由于胶结水力回填中的偏析,按照当前实践通过实验室测试获得的UCS可能无法代表地下采场的现场强度分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号