...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?
【24h】

Are “normal hips” being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?

机译:是否由于EE角将“正常臀部”标记为股骨髋臼撞击?

获取原文

摘要

Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a clinical syndrome characterized by gait abnormality and limb dysfunction, as well as secondary deformities of pelvis and femur. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) typically could be diagnosed on the basis of computed tomography (CT) such as the equatorial-edge angle (EE angle), but it did not work well in GMC patients. In this study, we retrospected all image data and found small EE angles in GMCs, which meant retroverted acetabulum; however, none of them showed no symptoms and signs of FAI. Therefore, we had reasons to think that, some normal hips with unbalanced hip myodynamia as same as GMCs, may be incorrectly diagnosed as FAI through measuring EE angle only. In consequence, the paper was designed to assess the use of the EE angle in the assessment of FAI in the diagnosis, as described by Werner. Twenty-three patients (46 hips) were collected and calculated with the “equatorial-edge angle” (EE angle) by CT scans. All of them were excluded from FAI. Review of the hips showed a mean EE angle was 12.93°, with a minimum of -3.42° and a maximum of 24.08°. The mean value for males and females were 13.52° and 12.40°, respectively, without statistical significance, although the mean value of left hips and right sides reached 13.32° and 12.54° individually, not having statistical differences neither. There were not any symptoms or signs of FAI in all patients. Thus, the reduced EE angle could suggest the local excessive coverage of the femoral head by the anterior acetabular edge, but might not be a reasonably good predictor of FAI. GMC patient's acetabular deformity mainly manifests as increased retroversion, which may be the anatomical basis for FAI and lead to high risks of the acetabular impingement. However, all patients in this study showed no symptoms and signs of FAI, suggesting that the measurement of EE angle can only be applied to assessing those people with normal hip myodynamia, and the bone deformity and the muscular disorder should be both considered in the diagnosis of FAI.
机译:臀肌挛缩症(GMC)是一种临床综合征,以步态异常和肢体功能障碍以及骨盆和股骨继发畸形为特征。髋臼前撞击(FAI)通常可以根据计算机断层扫描(CT)(例如赤道边缘角(EE角))进行诊断,但在GMC患者中效果不佳。在这项研究中,我们对所有图像数据进行了回顾,发现GMC中的EE角较小,这意味着髋臼逆行。然而,它们都没有显示出固定资产投资的症状和体征。因此,我们有理由认为,仅通过测量EE角度,某些与GMC相同但髋部肌力不平衡的正常髋部可能被误诊为FAI。因此,如Werner所述,本文旨在评估EE角在诊断FAI中的应用。收集23例患者(46髋)并通过CT扫描以“赤道边缘角”(EE角)进行计算。他们都被排除在固定资产投资之外。髋关节检查显示,平均EE角为12.93°,最小值为-3.42°,最大值为24.08°。男性和女性的平均值分别为13.52°和12.40°,无统计学意义,尽管左臀部和右侧的平均值分别达到13.32°和12.54°,两者也没有统计学差异。所有患者均无任何FAI症状或体征。因此,减小的EE角可能暗示髋臼前缘局部覆盖了股骨头,但可能不是FAI的合理良好预测指标。 GMC患者的髋臼畸形主要表现为逆行增加,这可能是FAI的解剖基础,并导致髋臼撞击的高风险。但是,本研究的所有患者均未显示FAI的症状和体征,这表明EE角的测量仅可用于评估髋关节肌痛正常的人,并且在诊断时应同时考虑骨畸形和肌肉疾病FAI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号