首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Effects of combined oral sucrose and nonnutritive sucking (NNS) on procedural pain of NICU newborns, 2001 to 2016: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effects of combined oral sucrose and nonnutritive sucking (NNS) on procedural pain of NICU newborns, 2001 to 2016: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:口服蔗糖和非营养性吮吸(NNS)联合治疗对新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)程序性疼痛的影响,2001年至2016年:符合PRISMA的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Both oral sucrose (OS) and nonnutritive sucking (NNS) are effective nonpharmacological methods to alleviate procedures pain in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) newborns when they were used alone, but the combined effect of OS+NNS remains controversial. So, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficiency of NNS combined with oral sucrose on pain relief in NICU newborns undergoing painful procedures. Methods: We searched PubMed, Ovid (Medline), Embase (Medline), Cochrane Central Library, and other resources such as Google Scholar, bibliographies of included literatures for all available articles. Two reviewers screened literatures and extracted data independently. The fixed effects model was used to pool the results using Reviewer Manager (RevMan) 5.3. As each study included in our meta-analysis had been approved by Ethics Committee or institutional review board, thus our study did not need ethical approval. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials, including 599 participants, were contained in our meta-analysis. The combination of oral sucrose and NNS is associated with reduced pain scores (mean difference [MD], ?0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?0.68 to ?0.36); shortened crying time (MD,?0.92; 95% CI, ?1.39 to ?0.44); but the 2 groups did not differ significantly in reducing bradycardia (MD, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.32–1.68), tachycardia (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38–1.10), or desaturations (MD, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.32–1.68). Conclusion: The pooled evidence indicates that the combination measures may serve as an evidence-based guideline for pain relief among patients having minor pain. Besides, it also indicates that OS combined with NNS can be an alternative for better prevention and management of procedure pain in NICU newborns. Nevertheless, the results may be limited due to incomplete data, and thus, more randomized controlled trials or well-designed studies are required to determine the effects of OS+NNS in the future.
机译:背景:口服蔗糖(OS)和非营养性吮吸(NNS)都是减轻新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)新生儿单独使用时的手术疼痛的有效非药理方法,但OS + NNS的综合作用仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以评估NNS联合口服蔗糖对正在经历痛苦手术的NICU新生儿缓解疼痛的效果。方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Ovid(Medline),Embase(Medline),Cochrane中央图书馆以及其他资源,例如Google Scholar,包括所有可用文献的参考书目。两位审稿人筛选了文献并独立提取了数据。固定效果模型用于使用Reviewer Manager(RevMan)5.3合并结果。由于纳入我们的荟萃分析的每项研究均已获得伦理委员会或机构审查委员会的批准,因此我们的研究无需伦理学批准。结果:我们的荟萃分析包含七项随机对照试验,包括599名参与者。口服蔗糖和NNS的组合可降低疼痛评分(平均差异[MD]为0.52; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.68至0.36);缩短的哭泣时间(MD,≤0.92; 95%CI,≤1.39至≤0.44);但两组在减少心动过缓(MD,0.73; 95%CI,0.32-1.68),心动过速(MD,0.65; 95%CI,0.38-1.10)或去饱和(MD,0.73; 95%CI)方面没有显着差异。 ,0.32-1.68)。结论:汇总的证据表明,联合措施可作为轻度疼痛患者的循证指南,以减轻疼痛。此外,这也表明OS与NNS结合可以更好地预防和控制新生儿重症监护室(NICU)新生儿的过程性疼痛。然而,由于数据不完整,结果可能会受到限制,因此,需要更多的随机对照试验或精心设计的研究来确定OS + NNS的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号