...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections
【24h】

Meta-analysis of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on postoperative outcomes after liver resections

机译:肝切除术后缺血预适应(IP)的荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: The protective role (decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury) of ischemic preconditioning (IP) before continuous vascular occlusion in liver resection is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the advantages and any potential disadvantages of IP maneuver. Methods: A systematic search in the Embase, Medline, PubMed databases, and the Cochrane Library was performed using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, mortality, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and total bilirubin (TB) level. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using either the random effects model or fixed effects model. Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 918 patients were analyzed to achieve a summated outcome. The patients have been divided into IP group (n = 455) and no IP group (n = 463) before continuous vascular occlusion. No significant difference was found in postoperative mortality between both groups ( P = .30). Subgroup analysis revealed that the postoperative morbidity in the cirrhosis subgroup was significantly less for the IP group compared with the control group ( P = .01). In the cirrhosis subgroup, the result was stable ( P = .04), without heterogeneity ( P = .59; I 2 = 0%). Meta-analysis of AST level on postoperative day (POD) 1 indicated lower postoperative AST level in the IP group ( P = .04). The analysis of ALT level showed lower ALT level in the IP group versus control group ( P = .02). However, there was no difference in postoperative AST and ALT level after excluding 1 study with statistical heterogeneity (all P > .05). With respect to postoperative TB level, there was no significant difference between 2 groups. Conclusion: IP cannot decrease the hospital mortality for patients undergoing hepatectomy. IP may be beneficial for patients with cirrhosis due to less morbidity in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, we cannot conclude that IP can decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury because it did not significantly decrease postoperative AST, ALT, and TB levels.
机译:背景:在肝脏切除术中持续进行血管阻塞之前,缺血预处理(IP)的保护作用(减轻缺血再灌注损伤)是有争议的。这项荟萃分析旨在比较IP操纵的优势和任何潜在的劣势。方法:使用医学主题词(MeSH)和截短词搜索在Embase,Medline,PubMed数据库和Cochrane库中进行了系统搜索,以识别关于该主题的所有随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是术后发病率,死亡率,术后天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平,丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平和总胆红素(TB)水平。使用随机效应模型或固定效应模型计算具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的合并赔率比(OR)和加权平均差(WMD)。结果:分析了涉及918例患者的13项RCT,以得出汇总结果。在连续血管阻塞之前,将患者分为IP组(n = 455)和无IP组(n = 463)。两组的术后死亡率均无显着差异(P = .30)。亚组分析显示,与对照组相比,IP组肝硬化亚组的术后发病率明显更低(P = 0.01)。在肝硬化亚组中,结果稳定(P = .04),没有异质性(P = .59;我 2 = 0%)。术后第1天(POD)AST水平的荟萃分析表明,IP组术后AST水平较低(P = .04)。 ALT水平的分析显示IP组的ALT水平低于对照组(P = .02)。但是,排除1项具有统计学异质性的研究后,术后AST和ALT水平无差异(所有P> .05)。就术后结核病水平而言,两组之间无显着差异。结论:IP不能降低接受肝切除术患者的医院死亡率。由于肝硬化患者的发病率较低,IP可能对肝硬化患者有益。但是,我们不能得出IP可以减少缺血再灌注损伤的结论,因为IP并不能显着降低术后AST,ALT和TB的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号