首页> 外文期刊>Medycyna Pracy >Muscle activity during endotracheal intubation using 4 laryngoscopes (Macintosh laryngoscope, Intubrite, TruView Evo2 and King Vision) – A comparative study
【24h】

Muscle activity during endotracheal intubation using 4 laryngoscopes (Macintosh laryngoscope, Intubrite, TruView Evo2 and King Vision) – A comparative study

机译:使用4台喉镜(Macintosh喉镜,Intubrite,TruView Evo2和King Vision)在气管插管过程中的肌肉活动–比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Successful endotracheal intubation requires mental activity and no less important physical activity from the anesthesiologist,so ergonomics of used devices is important. The aim of our study has been to compare 4 laryngoscopes regardingan operator’s activity of selected muscles of the upper limb, an operator’s satisfaction with used devices and an operator’s fatigueduring intubation attempts. Material and Methods: The study included 13 anesthesiologists of similar seniority. To measuremuscle activity MyoPlus 2 with 2-channel surface ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) test device was used. Participant’s satisfactionwith studied devices was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale. An operator’s fatigue during intubation efforts was evaluatedby means of the modified Borg’s scale. Results: The highest activity of all the studied muscles was observed for the Intubritelaryngoscope, followed by the Mackintosh, TruView Evo2 and the lowest one – for the King Vision video laryngoscope. A significantstatistical difference was observed for the King Vision and the rest of laryngoscopes (p 0.05). No significant statisticaldifferences were observed between the Macintosh, TruView Evo2 and Intubrite laryngoscopes (p 0.05). The shortest time ofintubation was achieved using the standard Macintosh blade laryngoscope. The highest satisfaction was noted for the King Visionvideo laryngoscope, and the lowest for – the TruView Evo2. The Intubrite was the most demanding in terms of workload, inthe opinion of the participants’, and the least demanding was the King Vision video laryngoscope. Conclusions: Muscle activity,namely the force used for intubation, is the smallest when the King Vision video laryngoscope is used with the highest satisfactionand lowest workload, and the highest muscle activity was proven for the Intubrite laryngoscope with the highest workload. Med Pr 2016;67(2):155–162
机译:背景:成功的气管插管需要精神活动,而麻醉医生的身体活动同样重要,因此二手设备的人体工程学很重要。我们的研究目的是比较4台喉镜,它们涉及操作者上肢所选肌肉的活动,操作者对使用过的器械的满意度以及操作者在插管尝试中的疲劳程度。材料和方法:该研究包括13位类似资历的麻醉师。为了测量肌肉活动,使用具有2通道表面ElectroMyoGraphy(sEMG)测试设备的MyoPlus 2。使用Visual Analog Scale评估参与者对研究设备的满意度。通过修改后的Borg量表评估操作者在插管过程中的疲劳程度。结果:在所有经研究的肌肉中,插管式喉镜的活动最高,其次是麦金托什,TruView Evo2,最低的是King Vision视频喉镜。 King Vision和其他喉镜观察到显着的统计学差异(p <0.05)。在Macintosh,TruView Evo2和Intubrite喉镜之间未观察到显着的统计学差异(p> 0.05)。使用标准的Macintosh刀片喉镜可以实现最短的插管时间。 King Visionvideo喉镜的满意度最高,而TruView Evo2则最低。与会人员认为,Intubrite的工作量要求最高,而King Vision视频喉镜的要求最低。结论:当使用King Vision视频喉镜时,肌肉活动(即用于插管的力)最小,满意度最高,工作量最低,而肌肉活动最大的是插管式喉镜,其工作量最高。 Med Pr 2016; 67(2):155–162

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号