...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:恩帕格列净治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the efficiency and tolerability of empagliflozin (EMPA) as monotherapy or add-on to existing therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy and safety of EMPA vs placebo or EMPA plus other antidiabetes drugs vs placebo plus other oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) in T2DM were recruited from electronic database Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), supplemented by a hand search of the reference lists of selected articles. Main effect sizes were change from baseline on glycemia control, body weight, blood pressure, and complications (i.e., incidence of urinary and genital tract infections, and morbidity of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia). Random-effects model was used to account for clinical or methodologic heterogeneity across studies. Results: Fifteen RCTs with a total number of 7891 individuals (5374 in EMPA group and 2517 in control group) were suitable for this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that significant improvements in glycemia control, body weight, and blood pressure were associated with EMPA application (i.e., monotherapy and add-on therapy ) in patient with T2DM when compared with placebo. Meanwhile, EMPA 10 and 20 mg improved glycemia, body weight, and blood pressure control for patients with T2DM. There was no significant difference in incidence of hypoglycemia and urinary tract infections across EMPA and placebo group. Significant reduced risk of hyperglycemia was revealed in EMPA group vs placebo (risk ratio: 0.34, 95%confidence interval: 0.23–0.49, P .00001), except in patients on background insulin therapy. However, increased risk of genital infection was noted across EMPA vs placebo (risk ratio: 2.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.80–3.71, P .00001). Conclusion: Our evidence supports the application of EMPA in treatment of patients with T2DM who are obesity or at risk of weight gain.
机译:背景:本研究旨在评估恩帕格列净(EMPA)作为2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的单药治疗或现有治疗的附加治疗的有效性和耐受性。方法:从电子数据库Pubmed,Web of Knowledge和Cochrane Central Register中收集了比较EMPA与安慰剂或EMPA加其他抗糖尿病药与安慰剂加其他口服抗糖尿病药(OAD)在T2DM中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。对照试验(CENTRAL),以人工搜索选定文章的参考列表为补充。主要影响的大小是在控制血糖,体重,血压和并发症(即尿路和生殖道感染的发生率以及低血糖和高血糖的发病率)方面与基线相比有所变化。随机效应模型用于说明研究之间临床或方法学的异质性。结果:15篇随机对照试验(总数为7891人)(EMPA组为5374,对照组为2517)适合进行这项荟萃分析。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,T2DM患者的EMPA应用(即单一疗法和附加疗法)与血糖控制,体重和血压的显着改善有关。同时,EMPA 10和20 mg可改善T2DM患者的血糖,体重和血压控制。在EMPA和安慰剂组之间,低血糖和尿路感染的发生率无显着差异。 EMPA组与安慰剂组相比,高血糖风险显着降低(风险比:0.34,95%置信区间:0.23-0.49,P <.00001),但接受背景胰岛素治疗的患者除外。但是,EMPA与安慰剂相比,生殖器感染的风险有所增加(风险比:2.59,95%置信区间:1.80-3.71,P <.00001)。结论:我们的证据支持EMPA在肥胖或有体重增加风险的T2DM患者中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号