首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Surgical Versus Conservative Intervention for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses
【24h】

Surgical Versus Conservative Intervention for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses

机译:急性跟腱断裂的外科手术和保守干预:重叠荟萃分析的符合PRISMA的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Although many meta-analyses comparing surgical intervention with conservative treatment have been conducted for acute Achilles tendon rupture, discordant conclusions are shown. This study systematically reviewed the overlapping meta-analyses relating to surgical versus conservative intervention of acute Achilles tendon rupture to assist decision makers select among conflicting meta-analyses, and to offer intervention recommendations based on the currently best evidence. Multiple databases were comprehensively searched for meta-analyses comparing surgical with conservative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Meta-analyses only comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two authors independently evaluated the meta-analysis quality and extracted data. The Jadad decision algorithm was applied to ascertain which meta-analysis offered the best evidence. A total of 9 meta-analyses were included. Only RCTs were determined as Level-II evidence. The scores of Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) ranged from 5 to 10 (median 7). A high-quality meta-analysis with more RCTs was selected according to the Jadad decision algorithm. This study found that when functional rehabilitation was used, conservative intervention was equal to surgical treatment regarding the incidence of rerupture, range of motion, calf circumference, and functional outcomes, while reducing the incidence of other complications. Where functional rehabilitation was not performed, conservative intervention could significantly increase rerupture rate. Conservative intervention may be preferred for acute Achilles tendon rupture at centers offering functional rehabilitation, because it shows a similar rerupture rate with a lower risk of other complications when compared with surgical treatment. However, surgical treatment should be considered at centers without functional rehabilitation as this can reduce the incidence of rerupture.
机译:尽管已经对急性跟腱断裂进行了许多荟萃分析,将手术干预与保守治疗进行了比较,但得出的结论不一致。这项研究系统地回顾了与急性跟腱断裂的手术或保守干预相关的重叠荟萃分析,以帮助决策者在相互矛盾的荟萃分析中进行选择,并根据当前的最佳证据提供干预建议。全面搜索了多个数据库以进行荟萃分析,以比较急性跟腱破裂手术与保守治疗的比较。荟萃分析仅包括随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者独立评估了荟萃分析的质量并提取了数据。应用Jadad决策算法确定哪种荟萃分析提供了最佳证据。总共包括9项荟萃分析。仅将RCT确定为II级证据。多重系统评价评估(AMSTAR)的得分在5到10之间(中位数为7)。根据Jadad决策算法,选择了具有更多RCT的高质量荟萃分析。这项研究发现,在进行功能康复时,就复发率,运动范围,小腿围和功能结局而言,保守干预等同于手术治疗,同时减少了其他并发症的发生。如果不进行功能性康复,保守干预可以显着提高复发率。在提供功能性康复的中心,保守治疗可能会首选急性跟腱断裂,因为与外科手术治疗相比,它显示出相似的复发率,并且发生其他并发症的风险更低。但是,应该在没有功能康复的中心考虑手术治疗,因为这样可以减少复发的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号