...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The impact of mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss in glaucoma on patients’ quality of life measured via the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire: A meta-analysis
【24h】

The impact of mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss in glaucoma on patients’ quality of life measured via the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire: A meta-analysis

机译:青光眼轻度,中度和重度视野丧失对患者生活质量的影响,通过《青光眼生活质量15调查表》进行了荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: We performed a meta-analysis to determine the impact of mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss on quality of life (QoL) in patients with glaucoma. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed , Excerpta Medica dateBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases to identify relevant articles published before June 30, 2016. Patients’ QoL was measured using the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire (GQL-15). Results: In total, 401 patients with glaucoma and 205 patients without glaucoma participated in 4 experiments. The GQL-15 summary scores are statistically different between patients with and without glaucoma (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73–1.16, P < .01). GQL-15 summary scores for patients with mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss all differed significantly from those of patients without glaucoma; the SMDs for their summary scores were as follows: mild: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.22, P = .01; moderate: 2.05, 95% CI: 0.91 to 3.19, P < .001; and severe: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.44 to 3.71, P < .001. Two factor scores for central and near vision (SMD = ?0.35, 95% CI: ?1.01 to 0.30, P = .29) and glare and dark adaptation (SMD = ?0.36, 95% CI: ?1.01 to 0.30, P = .28) did not differ significantly between patients with mild and moderate visual field loss. However, summary scores and 2 factor scores (peripheral vision and outdoor mobility) differed significantly between patients with mild and moderate glaucoma. In addition, summary scores and all 4 factor scores differed significantly between patients with mild and severe glaucoma. Moreover, summary scores and 3 factor scores (peripheral vision, glare and dark adaptation, and outdoor mobility) differed significantly between patients with moderate and severe glaucoma. However, scores for 1 factor (central and near vision) did not differ significantly between any of the patient groups (SDM = ?0.53, 95% CI = ?1.33 to 0.27, P = .19). Conclusions: Glaucoma patients with visual field loss showed significantly poorer QoL relative to that of patients without glaucoma. Patients’ QoL decreased as their glaucoma severity increased.
机译:背景:我们进行了荟萃分析,以确定青光眼患者的轻度,中度和重度视野丧失对生活质量(QoL)的影响。方法:使用PubMed,Excerpta Medica dateBASE和中国国家知识基础设施数据库进行全面的文献检索,以鉴定2016年6月30日之前发表的相关文章。使用《 15期青光眼生活质量问卷》(GQL-15)评估患者的生活质量)。结果:总共401例青光眼患者和205例无青光眼患者参加了4个实验。有和没有青光眼的患者之间的GQL-15汇总评分在统计学上是不同的(标准均值差[SMD] = 0.94,95%置信区间[CI]:0.73-1.16,P <0.01)。轻度,中度和重度视野丧失患者的GQL-15汇总评分与无青光眼患者的GQL-15汇总评分有显着差异。 SMD的总体评分如下:轻度:1.24,95%CI:0.26至2.22,P = 0.01;中度:2.05,95%CI:0.91至3.19,P <.001;重度:2.57,95%CI:1.44至3.71,P <.001。中枢和近视的两个因素评分(SMD = 0.35,95%CI:1.01至0.30,P = 0.29)和眩光和暗适应(SMD = 0.36,95%CI:1.01至0.30,P = .28)轻度和中度视野丧失的患者之间无显着差异。但是,轻度和中度青光眼患者的总分和2个因素得分(周围视野和户外活动能力)差异显着。此外,轻度和重度青光眼患者的总分和所有4个因子得分均存在显着差异。此外,中度和重度青光眼患者的总分和三因素得分(周围视力,眩光和黑暗适应以及户外活动)差异显着。然而,在任何患者组中,1个因素(中央和近视)的得分没有显着差异(SDM = 0.53,95%CI = 1.33至0.27,P = 0.19)。结论:与没有青光眼的患者相比,视野丧失的青光眼患者的QoL明显较差。随着青光眼严重程度的提高,患者的生活质量下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号