...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The efficacy of periarticular drug infiltration for postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The efficacy of periarticular drug infiltration for postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:关节周围药物浸润对全髋关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The ability of intraoperative periarticular drug infiltration (PDI) to control pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been studied for many times, but it still remains controversial. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDI on postoperative pain after THA. Methods: Databases, including Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library, were searched to identify randomized controlled trials concerning PDI for pain management in patients undergoing THA. The primary outcomes included pain score with rest or activity and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and complications (nausea or vomiting). Results: A total of 666 THA patients from 8 randomized controlled trials were subjected to meta-analysis. The results showed that the PDI group had better pain relief, less opioid consumption, and less length of hospital, when compared with the placebo group ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in regard to visual analog score with activity and complications between the 2 groups. Conclusion: PDI may be recommended for the pain management after THA. However, due to the variations in the included studies, additional studies are still needed to validate these conclusions.
机译:背景:术中关节周围药物浸润(PDI)控制全髋关节置换术(THA)后疼痛的能力已被研究了很多次,但仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,以评估PDI对THA术后疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:检索包括Pubmed,Medline,Embase,Web of Science和Cochrane库在内的数据库,以鉴定涉及PDI的THA患者疼痛控制的随机对照试验。主要结局包括休息或活动时的疼痛评分以及阿片类药物的消耗。次要结果是住院时间和并发症(恶心或呕吐)。结果:来自8个随机对照试验的666名THA患者接受了荟萃分析。结果显示,与安慰剂组相比,PDI组具有更好的止痛效果,更少的阿片类药物消耗和更少的住院时间(P <0.05)。两组之间在视觉模拟评分,活动性和并发症方面均未观察到显着差异。结论:PDI可能被推荐用于THA后的疼痛处理。但是,由于所包括研究的差异,仍然需要进行其他研究以验证这些结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号