首页> 外文期刊>Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases >DIFFERENCES IN EX-VIVO CHEMOSENSITIVITY TO ANTHRACYCLINES IN FIRST LINE ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
【24h】

DIFFERENCES IN EX-VIVO CHEMOSENSITIVITY TO ANTHRACYCLINES IN FIRST LINE ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

机译:第一线急性髓性白血病的体外对蒽环类药物的化学敏感性差异

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Induction schedules in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are based on combinations of cytarabine and anthracyclines. The choice of the anthracycline employed has been widely studied in multiple clinical trials showing similar complete remission rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an ex vivo test we have analyzed if a subset of AML patients may respond differently to cytarabine combined with idarubicin, daunorubicin or mitoxantrone. Bone marrow (BM) samples of 198 AML patients were incubated for 48 hours in 96 well plates, each well containing different drugs or drug combinations at different concentrations. Ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis was made using the PharmaFlow platform maintaining the BM microenvironment. Drug response was evaluated as depletion of AML blast cells in each well after incubation. Annexin V-FITC was used to quantify the ability of the drugs to induce apoptosis, and pharmacological responses were calculated using pharmacokinetic population models. RESULTS: Similar dose-respond graphs were generated for the three anthracyclines, with a slight decrease in ECsub50/sub with idarubicin (p=1.462E-06), whereas the interpatient variability of either drug was large. To identify those cases of selective sensitivity to anthracyclines, potency was compared, in terms of area under the curve. Differences in anthracycline monotherapy potency greater than 30% from 3 pairwise comparisons were identified in 28.3% of samples. Furthermore, different sensitivity was detected in 8.2% of patients comparing combinations of cytarabine and anthracyclines. DISCUSSION: A third of the patients could benefit of the use of this test in the first line induction therapy selection, although it should be confirmed in a clinical trial specifically designed.
机译:背景:急性髓性白血病(AML)的诱导时间表是基于阿糖胞苷和蒽环类药物的组合。蒽环类药物的选择已在多项临床试验中得到了广泛研究,显示出相似的完全缓解率。材料与方法:使用离体试验,我们分析了一部分AML患者对阿糖胞苷,柔红霉素或米托蒽醌联合阿糖胞苷的反应是否不同。将198名AML患者的骨髓(BM)样品在96孔板中孵育48小时,每个孔包含不同浓度的药物或药物组合。使用PharmaFlow平台保持BM微环境进行离体药物敏感性分析。孵育后,将每个孔中AML原始细胞的消耗评估为药物反应。 Annexin V-FITC用于量化药物诱导凋亡的能力,并使用药代动力学种群模型计算药理反应。结果:三种蒽环类药物产生相似的剂量反应图,其中依达比星的EC 50 略有降低(p = 1.462E-06),而两种药物的患者间差异均很大。为了确定对蒽环类抗生素有选择性敏感性的情况,比较了药效曲线下的面积。在38.3个成对比较中,蒽环类药物单药治疗效力的差异大于30%,这在28.3%的样品中得到了确认。此外,比较阿糖胞苷和蒽环类药物的组合,在8.2%的患者中检测到不同的敏感性。讨论:尽管应该在专门设计的临床试验中证实这一点,但仍有三分之一的患者可以在第一线诱导疗法选择中受益。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号