首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Control Group Paradigms in Studies Investigating Acute Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Performance–An Experiment on Expectation-Driven Placebo Effects
【24h】

Control Group Paradigms in Studies Investigating Acute Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Performance–An Experiment on Expectation-Driven Placebo Effects

机译:研究运动对认知表现的急性影响的研究中的对照组范式-预期驱动的安慰剂作用的实验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Many studies report improvements in cognitive performance following acute endurance exercise compared to control group treatment. These cognitive benefits are interpreted as a result of a physiological response to exercise. However, it was also hypothesized that expectation-driven placebo effects account for these positive effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute endurance exercise and multiple control group treatments. Methods: Healthy individuals ( N = 247, 24.26 ± 3.88 years) were randomized to eight different groups watching videos of a moderate, a vigorous exercise treatment or one control group treatment (waiting, reading, video-watching, stretching, myofascial release workout, and very light exercise). Then, they were introduced to three commonly used cognitive test procedures in acute exercise-cognition research (Stroop-test, Trail-Making-test, Free-recall-task). Participants rated the effect they would expect on their performance in those tasks, if they had received the treatment shortly before the task, on an 11-point Likert scale. Results: No significantly different expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute moderate exercise and control group treatments could be revealed. Participants expected significantly worse performance following vigorous exercise compared to following waiting and stretching for all cognitive tests. Significantly worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to after very light exercise was expected for Stroop and Free-recall. For Free-recall, participants expected worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to myofascial release training as well. Conclusion: Our results indicate that expectation-driven placebo effects are unlikely to cause the reported greater cognitive improvements following acute moderate and vigorous endurance exercise compared to following common control group treatments.
机译:简介:许多研究报告说,与对照组相比,急性耐力运动后认知能力得到改善。这些认知益处被解释为对运动的生理反应的结果。但是,也有人假设,期望驱动的安慰剂效应会导致这些积极效应。这项研究的目的是调查对急性耐力运动的认知益处的期望与多种对照组的治疗之间的差异。方法:将健康个体(N = 247,24.26±3.88岁)随机分为八组,分别观看中度,剧烈运动治疗或对照组的视频(等待,阅读,观看视频,伸展运动,肌筋膜放松锻炼,和非常轻松的锻炼)。然后,将它们介绍给急性运动认知研究中的三种常用认知测试程序(Stroop测试,Trail-Making测试,Free-Recall任务)。如果参与者在任务前不久接受了治疗,则以11点李克特量表对参与者所期望的效果进行评估。结果:对急性中度运动和对照组治疗的认知益处没有明显不同的期望。与所有等待认知测试的等待和伸展运动相比,参加者预计剧烈运动后的表现将明显较差。与Stroop和Free-Recall的轻度运动相比,剧烈运动后的表现明显较差。对于自由召回,与肌肉筋膜松解训练相比,参与者在剧烈运动后的表现也较差。结论:我们的结果表明,与普通对照组相比,在急性中度和剧烈耐力运动中,预期驱动的安慰剂作用不太可能导致已报道的更大的认知改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号