首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Control Group Paradigms in Studies Investigating Acute Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Performance–An Experiment on Expectation-Driven Placebo Effects
【2h】

Control Group Paradigms in Studies Investigating Acute Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Performance–An Experiment on Expectation-Driven Placebo Effects

机译:研究运动对认知表现的急性影响的对照组研究范式-预期驱动的安慰剂作用的实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Introduction: Many studies report improvements in cognitive performance following acute endurance exercise compared to control group treatment. These cognitive benefits are interpreted as a result of a physiological response to exercise. However, it was also hypothesized that expectation-driven placebo effects account for these positive effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute endurance exercise and multiple control group treatments.>Methods: Healthy individuals (N = 247, 24.26 ± 3.88 years) were randomized to eight different groups watching videos of a moderate, a vigorous exercise treatment or one control group treatment (waiting, reading, video-watching, stretching, myofascial release workout, and very light exercise). Then, they were introduced to three commonly used cognitive test procedures in acute exercise-cognition research (Stroop-test, Trail-Making-test, Free-recall-task). Participants rated the effect they would expect on their performance in those tasks, if they had received the treatment shortly before the task, on an 11-point Likert scale.>Results: No significantly different expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute moderate exercise and control group treatments could be revealed. Participants expected significantly worse performance following vigorous exercise compared to following waiting and stretching for all cognitive tests. Significantly worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to after very light exercise was expected for Stroop and Free-recall. For Free-recall, participants expected worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to myofascial release training as well.>Conclusion: Our results indicate that expectation-driven placebo effects are unlikely to cause the reported greater cognitive improvements following acute moderate and vigorous endurance exercise compared to following common control group treatments.
机译:>简介:许多研究报告说,与对照组相比,急性耐力运动后认知能力有所改善。这些认知益处被解释为对运动的生理反应的结果。但是,也有人假设,预期驱动的安慰剂效应会导致这些积极效应。这项研究的目的是调查对急性耐力运动的认知益处期望值与多组对照组治疗之间的差异。>方法:健康个体(N = 247,24.26±3.88岁)被随机分为八个不同组观看适度,有力的运动治疗或对照组的视频(等待,阅读,观看视频,伸展运动,肌筋膜松解锻炼和非常轻微的运动)。然后,将他们介绍给三种在急性运动认知研究中常用的认知测试程序(Stroop测试,Trail-Making测试,Free-Recall任务)。如果参与者在任务前不久接受了治疗,他们会以11点的李克特量表对他们在这些任务上的预期效果进行评估。>结果:可能会显示急性中度运动和对照组的治疗。与所有等待和伸展认知测试的参与者相比,剧烈运动后的参与者预期表现将显着降低。与Stroop和Free-Recall的轻度运动相比,剧烈运动后的表现明显较差。对于自由召回,参与者预期剧烈运动后的表现也要比肌筋膜释放训练还要差。>结论:我们的结果表明,预期驱动的安慰剂作用不太可能导致急性中度后所报告的更大的认知改善与以下普通对照组的治疗方法相比,运动强度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号