首页> 外文期刊>MBio >Improved Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection by Culturing Periprosthetic Tissue Specimens in Blood Culture Bottles
【24h】

Improved Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection by Culturing Periprosthetic Tissue Specimens in Blood Culture Bottles

机译:通过培养血培养瓶中的假体周围组织标本,可以更好地诊断假体关节感染

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Despite known low sensitivity, culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens on agars and in broths is routine. Culture of periprosthetic tissue samples in blood culture bottles (BCBs) is potentially more convenient, but it has been evaluated in a limited way and has not been widely adopted. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of inoculation of periprosthetic tissue specimens into blood culture bottles with standard agar and thioglycolate broth culture, applying Bayesian latent class modeling (LCM) in addition to applying the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for prosthetic joint infection. This prospective cohort study was conducted over a 9-month period (August 2013 to April 2014) at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and included all consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. Overall, 369 subjects were studied; 117 (32%) met IDSA criteria for prosthetic joint infection, and 82% had late chronic infection. Applying LCM, inoculation of tissues into BCBs was associated with a 47% improvement in sensitivity compared to the sensitivity of conventional agar and broth cultures (92.1 versus 62.6%, respectively); this magnitude of change was similar when IDSA criteria were applied (60.7 versus 44.4%, respectively; P = 0.003). The time to microorganism detection was shorter with BCBs than with standard media ( P < 0.0001), with aerobic and anaerobic BCBs yielding positive results within a median of 21 and 23?h, respectively. Results of our study demonstrate that the semiautomated method of periprosthetic tissue culture in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than and as specific as agar and thioglycolate broth cultures and yields results faster. IMPORTANCE Prosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery. Despite this, current microbiological techniques to detect and diagnose infections are imperfect. This study examined a new approach to diagnosing infections, through the inoculation of tissue samples from around the prosthetic joint into blood culture bottles. This study demonstrated that, compared to current laboratory practices, this new technique increased the detection of infection. These findings are important for patient care to allow timely and accurate diagnosis of infection.
机译:摘要尽管已知灵敏度较低,但通常在琼脂和肉汤中培养假体周围组织标本。在血液培养瓶(BCB)中进行假体周围组织样品的培养可能更方便,但已对其进行了有限的评估,尚未得到广泛采用。这项研究的目的是比较使用标准琼脂和巯基乙酸盐培养物将假体周围组织标本接种到血液培养瓶中的敏感性和特异性,除应用美国传染病学会(IDSA)外,还应用贝叶斯潜伏类建模(LCM)。 )假体关节感染的标准。这项前瞻性队列研究在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic)进行了9个月(2013年8月至2014年4月),其中包括所有接受翻新置换术的连续患者。总共研究了369个主题。符合IDSA假体关节感染标准的患者为117(32%),晚期慢性感染患者为82%。应用LCM,将组织接种到BCB中,与传统琼脂和肉汤培养的敏感性相比,敏感性提高了47%(分别为92.1%和62.6%)。采用IDSA标准时,变化幅度相似(分别为60.7%和44.4%; P = 0.003)。与标准培养基相比,使用BCB进行微生物检测的时间要短(P <0.0001),有氧和厌氧BCB分别在中值21和23 h内产生阳性结果。我们的研究结果表明,在血培养瓶中进行假体周围组织半自动化培养的方法比琼脂和巯基乙酸盐培养液更为灵敏,并且其特异性更高,并且产量更快。重要信息人工关节感染是关节置换手术的毁灭性并发症。尽管如此,目前用于检测和诊断感染的微生物技术仍不完善。这项研究通过将假关节周围的组织样本接种到血培养瓶中,研究了一种诊断感染的新方法。这项研究表明,与当前的实验室实践相比,这项新技术增加了对感染的检测。这些发现对患者的护理很重要,可以及时准确地诊断出感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号