...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
【24h】

Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children

机译:包含蒿甲醚-荧光粉联合使用的通用和创新抗疟药在坦桑尼亚儿童中控制简单疟疾的疟疾治疗效果比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundIn 2006, artemether–lumefantrine (ALU), specifically Coartem? (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland), was approved as the first-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. Due to poor availability and affordability of the innovator’s product, the government of Tanzania in 2013 prequalified the use of generic anti-malarial drugs, whereby Artefan? (Ajanta, Pharma Ltd, India) was the first to be approved.MethodsThis was an equivalence prospective study that aimed to determine the effectiveness of anti-malarial generic Artefan? in comparison with innovator’s product Coartem?. Patients aged 6 to 59?months with uncomplicated malaria were recruited and randomized to either receive Artefan? or Coartem? as a control. Participants were required to revisit clinic five times as follow up to monitor treatment outcome as per World Health Organization recommendations. On each visit, thick and thin blood smears, dried blood spot (DBS), haemoglobin concentrations and auxiliary temperature were performed and documented.ResultsOut of 230 recruited participants, 200 met inclusion criteria and were randomized equally to receive Artefan? and Coartem?. The overall PCR uncorrected cure rate were 80% for Artefan? and 75% for Coartem? (p?=?0.44). Adequate clinical and parasitological response were 82.1% for Artefan? and 74.7% for Coartem?, and there was no early treatment failure (ETF) observed in both arms of treatment. Both drugs showed excellent early parasite clearance, whereby no participants had peripheral parasitaemia on day 3. Late clinical failures (LCF) were 3.6% for Artefan? and 1.3% for Coartem? (p?=?0.31), and late parasitological failure (LPF) were 15.4% for Artefan? and 22.7% for Coartem? (p?=?0.32). Mean haemoglobin (g/dl) concentrations observed on day 28 were higher compared to day 0 for both drugs, although not statistically significant. Only one (1.3%) participant on Artefan? had temperature?≥?37.5?°C on day 3.ConclusionThe findings of this study indicate that both Artefan? and Coartem? are equivalent and effective in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst children in the Coast part of Tanzania.
机译:摘要背景2006年,蒿甲醚-萤石碱(ALU),特别是复方蒿甲醚? (Novartis Pharma AG,瑞士巴塞尔)被批准为坦桑尼亚治疗简单性疟疾的一线药物。由于创新产品的可用性和价格低廉,坦桑尼亚政府在2013年对使用抗疟药进行了资格预审,Artefan?方法(Ajanta,Pharma Ltd,India)是第一个获得批准的方法。这是一项等效的前瞻性研究,旨在确定抗疟药通用Artefan?的有效性。与创新产品Coartem?相比。招募了6到59个月大的并发疟疾的患者,并随机分配接受Artefan?或复方灵?作为控件。根据世界卫生组织的建议,要求参与者五次重访诊所,以跟踪治疗结果。每次访视时均进行了浓密和稀薄的血涂片,干血斑(DBS),血红蛋白浓度和辅助温度的记录。结果在230名被招募的参与者中,有200名符合入选标准,并随机分配接受Artefan?和复方丹? PCR总未经校正的治愈率为Artefan?80%。和Coartem的75%? (p≥0.44)。 Artefan?的临床和寄生虫学应答率为82.1%。 Coartem?占74.7%,并且在治疗的两个方面均未观察到早期治疗失败(ETF)。两种药物均显示出优异的早期寄生虫清除率,因此第3天没有参与者发生外周寄生物血症。和复方蒿甲醚的1.3%? (p≥0.31),而Artefan?的晚期寄生虫学衰竭(LPF)为15.4%。和22.7%的复方蒿甲醚? (p≥0.32)。两种药物在第28天观察到的平均血红蛋白(g / dl)浓度均高于第0天,尽管无统计学意义。只有一名(1.3%)的Artefan参与者?在第3天的体温≥37.5°C。结论本研究的结果表明,Artefan?和复方蒿甲醚?在坦桑尼亚沿海地区的儿童中,在控制单纯性疟疾方面具有同等效力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号