...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar
【24h】

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar

机译:回路介导的等温扩增(LAMP)用于在桑给巴尔无症状的低密度疟疾寄生虫携带者进行即时诊断

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Asymptomatic, low parasite density malaria infections are difficult to detect with currently available point-of-care diagnostics. This study piloted a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit for field-friendly, high-throughput detection of asymptomatic malaria infections during mass screening and treatment (MSAT) in Zanzibar, a malaria pre-elimination setting. Methods Screening took place in three known hotspot areas prior to the short rains in November. Finger-prick blood was taken for screening by rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and LAMP and collected on filter paper for subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses. LAMP results were compared to RDT and to PCR using McNemar’s test. Results Approximately 1,000 people were screened. RDT detected ten infections (1.0% (95% CI 0.3-1.6)) whilst both LAMP and PCR detected 18 (1.8% (95% CI 0.9-2.6)) infections. However, PCR identified three infections that LAMP did not detect and vice versa. LAMP testing was easy to scale-up in field conditions requiring minimal training and equipment, with results ready one to three hours after screening. Conclusions Despite lower than expected prevalence, LAMP detected a higher number of infections than the currently used diagnostic, RDT. LAMP is a field-friendly, sensitive diagnostic test that could be useful for MSAT malaria campaigns which require quick results to enable prompt treatment.
机译:背景技术目前可用的即时诊断很难检测到无症状,低寄生虫密度的疟疾感染。这项研究试验了一种环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)试剂盒,用于在疟疾预消除环境下的桑给巴尔进行大规模筛查和治疗(MSAT)期间,对无症状疟疾感染进行现场友好,高通量检测。方法在11月的短雨之前,在三个已知的热点地区进行了筛选。手指刺血通过快速诊断测试(RDT)和LAMP进行筛查,并收集在滤纸上用于随后的聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析。使用McNemar测试将LAMP结果与RDT和PCR进行了比较。结果筛选了约1,000人。 RDT检测到十种感染(1.0%(95%CI 0.3-1.6)),而LAMP和PCR均检测到18种(1.8%(95%CI 0.9-2.6))感染。但是,PCR确定了LAMP未检测到的三种感染,反之亦然。在需要最少培训和设备的现场条件下,LAMP测试很容易扩大规模,筛选后一到三个小时即可得到结果。结论尽管LAMP的患病率低于预期水平,但与目前使用的诊断RDT相比,其发现的感染数量更高。 LAMP是一种现场友好的敏感诊断测试,对于需要快速结果才能迅速进行治疗的MSAT疟疾运动可能很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号