首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial
【24h】

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial

机译:双氢青蒿素-哌喹与氯喹治疗阿富汗间日间疟疾的研究:一项开放的,非劣效性开放试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Afghanistan's national guidelines recommend chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax infection, the parasite responsible for the majority of its malaria burden. Chloroquine resistance in P. vivax is emerging in Asia. Therapeutic responses across Afghanistan have not been evaluated in detail. Methods Between July 2007 and February 2009, an open-label, randomized controlled trial of chloroquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients aged three months and over with slide-confirmed P. vivax mono-infections was conducted. Consistent with current national guidelines, primaquine was not administered. Subjects were followed up daily during the acute phase of illness (days 0-3) and weekly until day 56. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative parasitological failure rate at day 56 after the start of treatment, with the hypothesis being that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was non-inferior compared to chloroquine (Δ = 5% difference in proportion of failures). Results Of 2,182 individuals with positive blood films for P. vivax, 536 were enrolled in the trial. The day 28 cure rate was 100% in both treatment groups. Parasite clearance was more rapid with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine than chloroquine. At day 56, there were more recurrent infections in the chloroquine arm (8.9%, 95% CI 6.0-13.1%) than the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm (2.8%, 95% CI 1.4-5.8%), a difference in cumulative recurrence rate of 6.1% (2-sided 90%CI +2.6 to +9.7%). The log-rank test comparing the survival curves confirmed the superiority of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine over chloroquine (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that a lower initial haemoglobin concentration was also independently associated with recurrence. Both regimens were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions Chloroquine remains an efficacious treatment for the treatment of vivax malaria in Afghanistan. In a setting where radical therapy cannot be administered, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine provides additional benefit in terms of post-treatment prophylaxis, reducing the incidence of recurrence from 4-8 weeks after treatment. Trial Registration The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00682578.
机译:背景技术阿富汗的国家指南建议使用氯喹治疗间日疟原虫感染,这种寄生虫是疟疾负担的主要来源。间日疟原虫对氯喹的抗性在亚洲正在出现。尚未对阿富汗各地的治疗反应进行详细评估。方法2007年7月至2009年2月,进行了一项开放标签的氯喹和二氢青蒿素-哌喹在3个月及以上经玻片确诊间日疟原虫单一感染的患者的随机对照试验。与目前的国家指导方针一致,未施用伯氨喹。在疾病的急性期(第0-3天)每天接受随访,直到56天每周接受随访。主要终点是治疗开始后第56天的总体累积寄生虫学失败率,假设是双氢青蒿素-哌喹与氯喹相比,差值不差(故障比例中的Δ= 5%差异)。结果在2182名间日疟原虫血膜阳性的个体中,有536名参加了试验。两个治疗组的第28天治愈率均为100%。双氢青蒿素-哌喹的寄生虫清除速度比氯喹快。在第56天,氯喹组的复发感染(8.9%,95%CI 6.0-13.1%)比二氢青蒿素-哌喹组(2.8%,95%CI 1.4-5.8%)多,累积复发率差异6.1%(两面​​90%CI +2.6至+ 9.7%)。比较生存曲线的对数秩检验证实了二氢青蒿素-哌喹优于氯喹(p = 0.003)。多变量分析表明,较低的初始血红蛋白浓度也与复发独立相关。两种方案均耐受良好,未报告严重不良事件。结论氯喹仍然是治疗阿富汗间日间疟疾的有效方法。在无法进行根治性治疗的情况下,双氢青蒿素-哌喹在治疗后预防方面具有额外的益处,可减少治疗后4-8周的复发率。试验注册该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上以标识符NCT00682578注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号