首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine - trimethoprim versus artemether - lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cameroon, Ivory Coast and Senegal
【24h】

Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine - trimethoprim versus artemether - lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cameroon, Ivory Coast and Senegal

机译:双氢青蒿素-哌喹-甲氧苄啶与蒿甲醚-卢美他汀治疗喀麦隆,象牙海岸和塞内加尔单纯性恶性疟原虫的疗效和耐受性比较研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The ACT recommended by WHO is very effective and well-tolerated. However, these combinations need to be administered for three days, which may limit adherence to treatment. The combination of dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine phosphate - trimethoprim (Artecom?, Odypharm Ltd), which involves treatment over two days, appears to be a good alternative, particularly in malaria-endemic areas. This study intends to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine phosphate - trimethoprim (DPT) versus artemether - lumefantrine (AL) in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cameroon, Ivory Coast and Senegal. Methods This was a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial with a 28-day follow-up period comparing DPT to AL as the reference drug. The study involved patients of at least two years of age, suffering from acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria with fever. The WHO 2003 protocol was used. Results A total of 418 patients were included in the study and divided into two treatment groups: 212 in the DPT group and 206 in the AL group. The data analysis involved the 403 subjects who correctly followed the protocol (per protocol analysis), i.e. 206 (51.1%) in the DPT group and 197 (48.9%) in the AL group. The recovery rate at D14 was 100% in both treatment groups. The recovery rate at D28 was 99% in the DPT and AL groups before and after PCR results with one-sided 97.5% Confidence Interval of the rates difference > -1.90%. More than 96% of patients who received DPT were apyrexial 48 hours after treatment compared to 83.5% in the AL group (p < 0.001). More than 95% of the people in the DPT group had a parasite clearance time of 48 hours or less compared to approximately 90% in the AL group (p = 0.023). Both drugs were well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported during the follow-up period. All of the adverse events observed were minor and did not result in the treatment being stopped in either treatment group. The main minor adverse events reported were vomiting, abdominal pain and pruritus. Conclusion The overall efficacy and tolerability of DPT are similar to those of AL. The ease of taking DPT and its short treatment course (two days) may help to improve adherence to treatment. Taken together, these findings make this medicinal product a treatment of choice for the effective management of malaria in Africa.
机译:背景世卫组织建议的ACT非常有效且耐受性良好。但是,这些组合需要给药三天,这可能会限制对治疗的依从性。二氢青蒿素-磷酸哌喹-甲氧苄氨嘧啶(Artecom ?, Odypharm Ltd)的组合治疗需要两天,似乎是一个很好的选择,特别是在疟疾流行地区。这项研究旨在比较二氢青蒿素-磷酸哌喹-甲氧苄氨嘧啶(DPT)与蒿甲醚-lumefantrine(AL)联合治疗喀麦隆,象牙海岸和塞内加尔的复杂性恶性疟原虫的疗效和耐受性。方法这是一项随机,对照,开放标签的临床试验,为期28天,比较了DPT和AL作为参考药物。该研究涉及至少两岁的患有发烧的急性单纯性恶性疟原虫疟疾的患者。使用了WHO 2003方案。结果本研究共纳入418例患者,分为两个治疗组:DPT组212名,AL组206名。数据分析涉及403名正确遵循方案的受试者(按方案分析),即DPT组中的206名(51.1%)和AL组中的197名(48.9%)。两个治疗组在D14时的恢复率为100%。 PCR结果前后,DPT和AL组在D28时的回收率为99%,单边置信区间为97.5%,差异之差> -1.90%。治疗后48小时,接受DPT的患者中有96%以上是远轴的,而AL组为83.5%(p <0.001)。 DPT组中超过95%的人具有48小时或更短的寄生虫清除时间,而AL组中约90%(p = 0.023)。两种药物均耐受良好。随访期间未报告严重不良事件。观察到的所有不良事件都很轻微,并且没有导致在任何一个治疗组中停止治疗。报告的主要轻度不良事件为呕吐,腹痛和瘙痒。结论DPT的总体疗效和耐受性与AL相似。服用DPT的简易性及其较短的治疗过程(两天)可能有助于提高对治疗的依从性。综上所述,这些发现使该药品成为非洲有效控制疟疾的一种选择治疗方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号