首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychiatry >A New Test for Irony Detection: The Influence of Schizotypal, Borderline, and Autistic Personality Traits
【24h】

A New Test for Irony Detection: The Influence of Schizotypal, Borderline, and Autistic Personality Traits

机译:一种新的反讽检测方法:精神分裂症,分界线和自闭型人格特征的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Irony has repeatedly been suggested as a language based social cognition task. It has been argued to show specific variances in psychiatric disorders and healthy adults with certain personality traits. Above that, irony comprehension is based on a complex interplay of the informational context, the relationship of the conversational partners, and the personality of the recipient. The present study developed a video-based German language test for a systematic examination of irony detection accuracy (Tuerony). The test includes (i) a stereotypical conversation partner (doctor, actor) in (ii) different perspectives (direct interaction, neutral observer) and (iii) a bilateral chat history on a conventional messenger service interface with ironic criticism, ironic praise, literal criticism, and literal praise. Based on the continuous approach of psychiatric symptoms, schizotypal, borderline, and autistic personality traits were associated with irony detection accuracy in a healthy sample. Given the often reported role of mentalization in irony detection, these associations were also investigated. First, a broad variance of irony comprehension in our healthy sample could be shown. Second, schizotypal and borderline, but not autistic traits were significantly negatively associated with irony detection accuracy. Finally, in the current healthy sample, neither variation of the conversational context nor mentalization characteristics were significantly associated with performance beyond personality traits. The current results therefore highlight two aspects for future research in irony comprehension: the importance of ecological valid tests and the role of the individual personality of the recipient.
机译:具有讽刺意味的反反复复被建议作为一种基于语言的社交认知任务。据认为在精神障碍和具有某些人格特征的健康成年人中显示出特定的差异。除此之外,具有讽刺意味的理解是基于信息上下文,对话伙伴之间的关系以及接收者的个性的复杂相互作用。本研究开发了基于视频的德语测试,用于对反讽检测准确性(Tuerony)进行系统检查。该测试包括(i)具有定型的对话伙伴(医生,演员),具有(ii)不同的观点(直接互动,中立的观察者),以及(iii)在传统信使服务界面上的双边聊天记录,具有讽刺性批评,讽刺性赞美,直译批评和字面称赞。根据精神症状的连续方法,在健康样本中,精神分裂症,边缘性和自闭型人格特征与反讽检测准确性相关。鉴于经常报告的心理化在反讽检测中的作用,还对这些关联进行了调查。首先,可以显示我们健康样本中反讽理解的广泛差异。其次,精神分裂症和交界性(而非自闭性)与反讽检测的准确性显着负相关。最后,在当前健康的样本中,对话情境的变化和心理特征均与人格特质以外的表现均无显着相关。因此,目前的结果突出了反讽理解方面未来研究的两个方面:生态有效测试的重要性和接受者个人个性的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号