首页> 外文期刊>Forest and Society >Bridging social forestry and forest management units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from Sulawesi
【24h】

Bridging social forestry and forest management units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from Sulawesi

机译:联结社会林业和森林管理部门:在苏拉威西的案例中,将政策假想与实施实践并列

获取原文
       

摘要

As the priority forestry development programs in Indonesia in recent years, Social Forestry policies (SF) and Forest Management Units (FMU or KPH) still indicate low performance. The SF program in particular, is dependent on the role of the KPH as an institution in realizing its expected goals. Using the theory of bureaucratic politics, this article presents the implementation of the SF program under the KPH system and how both programs can mutually support or inhibit the development of the other. The research was conducted using policy content analysis in the implementation of SF and KPH programs by applying interview methods, questionnaires and field observations that are presented both qualitatively and descriptively. We find that the development of SF cannot be separated from the role of the KPH bureaucracy due to the absence of bureaucratic institutions at the site level. SF sites are located in KPH working areas and perform a central role in all aspects of SF management. However, SF programs are not clearly stated as one of the main tasks and functions of KPHs and the existence of KPH interests in realizing independence without special budget allocations for the development of SF are obstacles to its implementation. KPH also still face regulatory issues that have not fully supported KPH operations resulting in weak institutions and independence to governing hierarchies due to the strong influence of the bureaucracy at the central and provincial levels. On the other hand, the SF program is still perceived as a rival of KPHs in forest management areas and further suffer from rigid regulations that are difficult to apply, making it challenging for SF to support the objectives of KPH programming. Under these conditions, KPH tend to limit SF schemes, thus privileging specific different forestry partnership schemes that are anticipated to support the independence of the KPH.
机译:作为近年来印尼的优先林业发展计划,社会林业政策(SF)和森林管理部门(FMU或KPH)仍然表现不佳。特别是,SF项目取决于KPH作为实现其预期目标的机构的作用。本文使用官僚政治理论,介绍了KPH制度下的SF计划的实施情况,以及两个计划如何相互支持或阻碍另一个计划的发展。这项研究是通过应用定性和描述性的访谈方法,问卷和实地观察,在实施SF和KPH计划时使用政策内容分析进行的。我们发现,由于站点级缺少官僚机构,SF的发展与KPH官僚机构的作用不可分离。 SF站点位于KPH工作区,并在SF管理的所有方面都发挥着核心作用。但是,SF计划并未明确地表示为KPH的主要任务和功能之一,并且在没有为SF的发展分配特殊预算的情况下,KPH在实现独立性方面存在利益是其实施的障碍。 KPH还仍然面临无法完全支持KPH运营的监管问题,由于中央和省级官僚机构的强大影响,导致了薄弱的机构以及对统治等级的独立性。另一方面,SF计划仍被视为森林管理区域KPH的竞争对手,并且还受到难以实施的严格规定的影响,这使得SF难以支持KPH计划的目标。在这种情况下,KPH往往会限制SF计划,从而使特定的不同林业合作计划具有特权,这些计划有望支持KPH的独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号