首页> 外文期刊>Folia histochemica et cytobiologica >The comparison of two different embryo culture methods in the course of in vitro fertilization program.
【24h】

The comparison of two different embryo culture methods in the course of in vitro fertilization program.

机译:体外受精程序中两种不同胚胎培养方法的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of the study was to compare two different embryo culture methods in the course of in vitro fertilization program by means of fertilization rate, embryo development, total time and cost. 98 patients undergoing assisted reproduction procedures due to infertility were analyzed. The inclusion criteria for the study: first IVF-ET program, at least 10 MII oocytes, no indications for ICSI. Oocytes were divided into two study groups: group A- open culture (oocytes placed in four-well dishes together, then inseminated and cultured in successive wells) and group B - a closed culture (oocytes placed in microdroplets, each embryo cultured separately). The fertilization rate was assessed around 18 hours from insemination. The embryos were classified into four classes. The best embryos were chosen for transfer. In the group A the fertilization rate obtained was lower than in group B (68% vs. 78%, respectively). The microdroplet culture required more time on the insemination day and on the second day of culture, while the four-well dish method required more time on the first day of culture and on the day of transfer. On analyzing the total cost of the above procedures (MI medium and oil costs) it occurred that the microdroplet culture was more expensive than the four-well dish method (due to the intake of paraffin oil). However, the difference was of no practical importance. In the conclusion, microdroplet culture gives a higher fertilization rate than four-well dish culture, probably due to a homogenous sperm distribution. Despite the differences in time outside the incubator and laboratory expenses (which are after all insignificant) microdroplet culture allows a better control over the embryo development. The embryos of best developmental potential can therefore be chosen for ET.
机译:该研究的目的是通过受精率,胚胎发育,总时间和成本比较体外受精程序中两种不同的胚胎培养方法。分析了98例因不育而接受辅助生殖手术的患者。研究的纳入标准:第一个IVF-ET程序,至少10个MII卵母细胞,没有ICSI适应症。卵母细胞分为两个研究组:A组开放培养(将卵母细胞一起放在四孔培养皿中,然后进行授精并在连续的孔中培养),B组封闭培养(卵母细胞置于微滴中,每个胚胎分别培养)。授精后约18小时评估受精率。胚胎分为四类。选择最好的胚胎进行转移。 A组的受精率低于B组(分别为68%和78%)。微滴培养在授精当天和培养的第二天需要更多的时间,而四孔皿法在培养的第一天和转移当天需要更多的时间。在分析上述过程的总成本(MI介质和油成本)时,发现微滴培养比四孔培养皿法更昂贵(由于摄入石蜡油)。但是,这种差异没有实际意义。总之,微滴培养的受精率高于四孔培养皿,这可能是由于精子分布均匀所致。尽管孵化器和实验室费用之间的时间有所不同(毕竟微不足道),微滴培养仍然可以更好地控制胚胎的发育。因此可以选择具有最佳发育潜力的胚胎进行ET。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号