首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >The Impact of the Acquisition of Electronic Medical Texts on the Usage of Equivalent Print Books in an Academic Medical Library
【24h】

The Impact of the Acquisition of Electronic Medical Texts on the Usage of Equivalent Print Books in an Academic Medical Library

机译:电子医学文本的获取对高等医学图书馆等效印刷书籍使用的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives – This study examines whether acquiring a text in electronic format effects the usage of the print version of the text, focusing specifically on medical texts. Studies in the literature dealt specifically with general collections and it was not clear if they were applicable to medical collections. It was also not clear if these studies should play a role in determining whether a medical library should purchase electronic texts or whether reserve collections are still needed for print texts. Methods – Four usage studies were conducted using data from the circulation system and the electronic vendor systems. These were 1) trends of print usage; 2) trends of electronic usage; 3) a comparison of electronic usage with print usage of the same title in the reserve collection; 4) a comparison of electronic usage with print usage of the same title in the general collection. Results – In comparison to print, substantial usage is being made of electronic books. Print is maintaining a level pattern of usage while electronic usage is increasing steadily. There was a noticeable difference in the usage levels of the electronic texts as regards to the package in which they are contained. Usage of print texts both on reserve and in the general collection has decreased over time, however the acquisition of the electronic version of a medical title had little impact on the usage of the equivalent print version. Conclusion – There is a demand for medical texts in medical libraries. Electronic versions can replace print versions of texts in reserve. Further investigation is needed of current patterns of print collection usage, with particular emphasis on trends in reserve collection usage.
机译:目标–这项研究研究了获取电子格式的文本是否会影响文本的印刷版本的使用,特别是医学文本。文献中的研究专门针对一般收藏,尚不清楚它们是否适用于医学收藏。还不清楚这些研究是否应在确定医学图书馆是否应购买电子文本或是否仍需要印刷文献收藏的情况下发挥作用。方法–使用来自流通系统和电子供应商系统的数据进行了四次使用情况研究。这些是1)打印使用趋势; 2)电子使用趋势; 3)比较电子资源使用量与储备金中相同标题的印刷使用量; 4)在一般馆藏中将电子用法与相同标题的印刷用法进行比较。结果–与印刷相比,电子书正在大量使用。在电子使用量稳步增加的同时,印刷仍保持使用量的水平格局。电子文本在其所包含的包装方面的使用水平存在明显差异。随着时间的流逝,备用和一般收藏品中印刷文本的使用量都有所减少,但是,获得医学标题的电子版本对等效印刷版本的使用影响不大。结论–医学图书馆对医学文本有需求。电子版本可以代替备用文本。需要对当前的印刷馆藏使用方式进行进一步调查,尤其要注意储备馆藏使用的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号